Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing

被引:110
作者
Haga, S. B. [1 ]
O'Daniel, J. M. [1 ]
Tindall, G. M. [1 ]
Lipkus, I. R. [2 ]
Agans, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Inst Genome Sci & Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Nursing, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Survey Res Unit, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
public attitudes; survey; pharmacogenetic testing; CANCER-RISK; GENERAL-POPULATION; INFORMATION ORDER; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; UNITED-STATES; COLON-CANCER; GENETIC TEST; KNOWLEDGE; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1038/tpj.2011.1
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
To assess public attitudes and interest in pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing, we conducted a random-digit-dial telephone survey of US adults, achieving a response rate of 42% (n = 1139). Most respondents expressed interest in PGx testing to predict mild or serious side effects (73 +/- 3.29 and 85 +/- 2.91%, respectively), guide dosing (91%) and assist with drug selection (92%). Younger individuals (aged 18-34 years) were more likely to be interested in PGx testing to predict serious side effects (vs aged 55 + years), as well as Whites, those with a college degree, and who had experienced side effects from medications. However, most respondents (78 +/- 3.14%) were not likely to have a PGx test if there was a risk that their DNA sample or test result could be shared without their permission. Given differences in interest among some groups, providers should clearly discuss the purpose of testing, alternative testing options (if available) and policies to protect patient privacy and confidentiality. The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2012) 12, 197-204; doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.1; published online 15 February 2011
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 204
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Research with patriot air defense officers: Examining information order effects [J].
Adelman, L ;
Bresnick, T ;
Black, PK ;
Marvin, FF ;
Sak, SG .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1996, 38 (02) :250-261
[2]   A lay prescription for tailor-made drugs -: focus group reflections on pharmacogenomics [J].
Almarsdóttir, AB ;
Björnsdóttir, I ;
Traulsen, JM .
HEALTH POLICY, 2005, 71 (02) :233-241
[3]   Interest in learning of personal genetic risk for cancer: A general population survey [J].
Andrykowski, MA ;
Munn, RK ;
Studts, JL .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 25 (05) :527-536
[4]   Hereditary cancer risk notification and testing: How interested is the general population? [J].
Andrykowski, MA ;
Lightner, R ;
Studts, JL ;
Munn, RK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) :2139-2148
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, V3rd
[6]   Evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing of race-based pharmacogenomics: A focus group study of public understandings of applied genomic medication [J].
Bates, BR ;
Poirot, K ;
Harris, TM ;
Condit, CM ;
Achter, PJ .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2004, 9 (06) :541-559
[7]   Presenting risks and benefits to patients - The effect of information order on decision making [J].
Bergus, GR ;
Levin, IP ;
Elstein, AS .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 17 (08) :612-617
[8]   Informed lay preferences for delivery of racially varied pharmacogenomics [J].
Bevan, JL ;
Lynch, JA ;
Dubriwny, TN ;
Harris, TM ;
Achter, PJ ;
Reeder, AL ;
Condit, CM .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 5 (05) :393-399
[9]   Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations [J].
Catz, DS ;
Green, NS ;
Tobin, JN ;
Lloyd-Puryear, MA ;
Kyler, P ;
Umemoto, A ;
Cernoch, J ;
Browne, R ;
Wolman, F .
COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2005, 8 (03) :161-172
[10]   Attitudinal barriers to delivery of race-targeted pharmacogenomics among informed lay persons [J].
Condit, C ;
Templeton, A ;
Bates, BR ;
Bevan, JL ;
Harris, TM .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 5 (05) :385-392