Attitudes to and use of complementary medicine among physicians in the United Kingdom

被引:71
作者
Lewith, GT
Hyland, M
Gray, SF
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[2] Univ Plymouth, NHS Execut SW, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1054/ctim.2001.0475
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the use of attitudes to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among UK physicians. Design: Postal questionnaire. Subjects: All Members and Fellows of the Royal College of Physicians. Results: Twelve thousand, one hundred and sixty eight Members and Fellows were surveyed and a response rate of 23% (n = 2,875) was obtained. Responses from the small numbers of general practitioners (n = 127) were not included in the analyses, resulting in a sample size of 2,748: 79% of respondents were in NHS practice, 32% of respondents practised CAM themselves, and 41% referred patients to CAM; of those who referred patients, 78% referred between 0-3 patients per month. CAM is used by physicians more frequently in private as compared to NHS practice. Acupuncture, aromatherapy and manipulative medicine (osteopathy and chiropractic) are the most commonly referred to and the most commonly practised therapies. Eighty seven percent of those using CAM themselves, or as part of their clinical team's commitment, had not had any CAM training. Attitudes to CAM were generally positive, particularly among those in palliative care, rehabilitation, nuclear medicine, and genito-urinary medicine. Conclusions: Our conclusions must be tempered by the limited response rate, but assuming all non-responders were disinterested in CAM, then at least one in ten UK specialist physicians are actively involved in CAM treatments, although only 13% of our sample had received any CAM training. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 172
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   BELIEF IN THE EFFICACY OF ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE AMONG GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS IN THE NETHERLANDS [J].
KNIPSCHILD, P ;
KLEIJNEN, J ;
TERRIET, G .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1990, 31 (05) :625-626
[12]   Complementary and alternative medicine: an educational, attitudinal and research challenge [J].
Lewith, GT .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2000, 172 (03) :102-103
[13]  
LEWITH GT, UNPUB BRIT J GEN PRA
[14]   Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia [J].
MacLennan, AH ;
Wilson, DH ;
Taylor, AW .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9001) :569-573
[15]  
PERKIN MR, 1994, J ROY SOC MED, V87, P523
[16]  
PERREAULT C, 2000, MOL B INT U, V8, P71
[17]   Hospital consultants' views on homoeopathy [J].
Reilly, D ;
Bawden, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1999, 92 (04) :215-215
[18]  
Thomas KJ, 2001, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V51, P25
[19]  
THOMAS KJ, 1995, NATL SURVEY ACCESS C
[20]   Access to complementary medicine in general practice: survey in one UK health authority [J].
Wearn, AM ;
Greenfield, SM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1998, 91 (09) :465-470