An assessment of the number of CT slices necessary to plan breast radiotherapy

被引:12
作者
Vincent, D [1 ]
Beckham, W [1 ]
Delaney, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Canc Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
关键词
breast cancer; dose volume histograms; homogeneity; inhomogeneity; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00072-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of CT slices required to produce satisfactory dose distribution for tangential field irradiation of the chest wall and breast and to assess correlation of this with the volume of breast tissue treated. Forty-six patients underwent a CT scan of the thorax. An optimized plan was produced by assessing dose distribution on the central axis (CAX) slice only. This plan was then recalculated using the entire CT data set without any changes to the beam parameters. A separate optimized plan was generated using the CAX slice and two slices indicative of the upper and lower level of the field. This three-slice plan was then calculated using the entire CT data set. Finally an optimized 3D plan was generated using the entire CT data set. The different planning methods were compared using dose-volume histograms (DVH). Dose inhomogeneity was defined as any treatment volume outside the ICRU 50 dose distribution recommendations. Results: Fifty-two percent of single-slice plans and 21% of three-slice plans (when assessed volumetrically) had greater volumes of breast tissue outside the ICRU 50 report guidelines suggesting that better homogeneity could be achieved by assessing a greater number of slices. Seventy-nine percent of three-slice plans showed no homogeneity improvement if the plan was calculated with the entire 3D data set. Conclusions: We conclude that a single-slice plan is unsatisfactory in providing sufficient information about the dose variation across the treatment volume and that ideally a 3D plan with DVHs should be produced. If the required data is unavailable then a minimum of three slices should be used as an approximation. We also propose a software tool for treatment planning systems, which calculates the percentage of the total PTV having dose outside the ICRU 50 radiation dose distribution homogeneity guideline range. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 183
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   RADIOTHERAPY ALONE IN BREAST-CANCER .1. ANALYSIS OF TUMOR PARAMETERS, TUMOR DOSE AND LOCAL-CONTROL - THE EXPERIENCE OF THE GUSTAVE-ROUSSY INSTITUTE AND THE PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL [J].
ARRIAGADA, R ;
MOURIESSE, H ;
SARRAZIN, D ;
CLARK, RM ;
DEBOER, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1985, 11 (10) :1751-1757
[2]  
Asbury L, 1989, Med Dosim, V14, P161
[3]   THE EFFECT OF THE NUMBER OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC SLICES ON DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS AND EVALUATION OF TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEMS FOR RADIATION-THERAPY OF INTACT BREAST [J].
CHENG, CW ;
DAS, IJ ;
STEA, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 30 (01) :183-195
[4]   ANALYSIS OF COSMETIC RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE-I AND STAGE-II BREAST-CANCER TREATED BY BIOPSY AND IRRADIATION [J].
CLARKE, D ;
MARTINEZ, A ;
COX, RS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1983, 9 (12) :1807-1813
[5]  
Delaney G P, 1997, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/S0936-6555(97)80007-6
[6]   THE INFLUENCE OF LUNG DENSITY CORRECTIONS ON TREATMENT PLANNING FOR PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER [J].
FRAASS, BA ;
LICHTER, AS ;
MCSHAN, DL ;
YANKE, BR ;
DIAZ, RF ;
YEAKEL, KS ;
VANDEGEIJN, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1988, 14 (01) :179-190
[7]  
International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements, 1993, ICRU50
[8]  
Liauw S H, 1987, N J Med, V84, P706
[9]  
MAYLES WPM, 1991, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V22, P225
[10]   THE INFLUENCE OF BREAST SIZE ON LATE RADIATION EFFECTS AND ASSOCIATION WITH RADIOTHERAPY DOSE INHOMOGENEITY [J].
MOODY, AM ;
MAYLES, WPM ;
BLISS, JM ;
AHERN, RP ;
OWEN, JR ;
REGAN, J ;
BROAD, B ;
YARNOLD, JR .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 33 (02) :106-112