Quantifying the effect of IV contrast media on integrated PET/CT: Clinical evaluation.

被引:110
作者
Mawlawi, O
Erasmus, JJ
Munden, RF
Pan, T
Knight, AE
Macapinlac, HA
Podoloff, DA
Chasen, M
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
artifact; attenuation; contrast media; PET/CT;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.04.1740
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES. The use of IV contrast media in PET/CT can result in an overestimation of PET attenuation factors that potentially can affect interpretation. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of IV contrast media in PET/CT and assess its impact on patients with intrathoracic malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Nine patients had CTs performed with and without IV contrast media followed by F-18-FDG PET. PET images were reconstructed using contrast-enhanced and unenhanced CT. To quantify the effect of contrast media on standardized uptake values (SUV), similar regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the subclavian vein, heart, liver, spleen, and site of malignancy on both CT and corresponding reconstructed PET images, and the mean and maximum values were compared. In addition, two physicians blinded to the imaging parameters that were used evaluated the reconstructed PET images to assess whether IV contrast media had an effect on clinical interpretation. RESULTS. For all patient studies, the subclavian vein region on the ipsilateral side of contrast media administration had the highest increase in CT numbers with a corresponding average SUVmax increase of 27.1%. Similarly, ROIs of the heart and at the site of malignancy showed an increase in the maximum attenuation value with a corresponding average SUVmax increase of 16.7% and 8.4%, respectively. Other locations had relatively small attenuation value differences with a correspondingly negligible SUV variation. CONCLUSION. Although there is a significant increase in SUV in regions of high-contrast concentration when contrast-enhanced CT is used for attenuation correction, this increase is clinically insignificant. Accordingly, in PET/CT, IV contrast-enhanced CT can be used in combination with the PET to evaluate patients with cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 319
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIN BREAST CANC
[2]   Non-small cell lung cancer: Dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging [J].
Antoch, G ;
Stattaus, J ;
Nemat, AT ;
Marnitz, S ;
Beyer, T ;
Kuehl, H ;
Bockisch, A ;
Debatin, JF ;
Freudenberg, LS .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (02) :526-533
[3]  
Antoch G, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, p56S
[4]   Whole-body positron emission tomography-CT: Optimized CT using oral and IV contrast materials [J].
Antoch, G ;
Freudenberg, LS ;
Stattaus, J ;
Jentzen, W ;
Mueller, SP ;
Debatin, JF ;
Bockisch, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (06) :1555-1560
[5]  
Antoch G, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1339
[6]   CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT OF FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS IN CT - EFFECT OF SIZE AND HISTOLOGY [J].
BURGENER, FA ;
HAMLIN, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1983, 140 (02) :297-301
[7]   Applications of positron emission tomography/computed tomography image fusion in clinical positron emission tomography - Clinical use, interpretation methods, diagnostic improvements [J].
Cohade, C ;
Wahl, RL .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (03) :228-237
[8]   Pitfalls and artifacts in 18FDG PET and PET/CT oncologic imaging [J].
Cook, GJR ;
Wegner, EA ;
Fogelman, I .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2004, 34 (02) :122-133
[9]   2-18fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is a reliable predictor for viable tumor in postchemotherapy seminoma:: An update of the prospective multicentric SEMPET trial [J].
De Santis, M ;
Becherer, A ;
Bokemeyer, C ;
Stoiber, F ;
Oechsle, K ;
Sellner, F ;
Lang, A ;
Kletter, K ;
Dohmen, BM ;
Dittrich, C ;
Pont, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (06) :1034-1039
[10]   ORAL CONTRAST AGENTS IN CT OF THE ABDOMEN [J].
GARRETT, PR ;
MESHKOV, SL ;
PERLMUTTER, GS .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 153 (02) :545-546