2-18fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is a reliable predictor for viable tumor in postchemotherapy seminoma:: An update of the prospective multicentric SEMPET trial

被引:262
作者
De Santis, M
Becherer, A
Bokemeyer, C
Stoiber, F
Oechsle, K
Sellner, F
Lang, A
Kletter, K
Dohmen, BM
Dittrich, C
Pont, J
机构
[1] Kaiser Franz Josef Spital, Dept Med Oncol, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
[2] Kaiser Franz Josef Spital, Dept Surg, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
[3] Kaiser Franz Josef Spital, Ludwig Boltzmann Inst Appl Canc Res, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Vienna, Dept Nucl Med, Sch Med, Vienna, Austria
[5] Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Austrian Study Grp Urol Oncol, Feldkirch, Austria
[6] Univ Tubingen, Dept Med Oncol, Tubingen, Germany
[7] Univ Tubingen, Inst Nucl Med, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2004.07.188
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To define the clinical value of 2-(18)fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) as a predictor for viable residual tumor in postchemotherapy seminoma residuals in a prospective multicentric trial. Patients and Methods FDG PET studies in patients with metastatic pure seminoma who had radiographically defined postchemotherapy residual masses were correlated with either the histology of the resected lesion or the clinical outcome documented by computer tomography (CT), tumor markers, and/or physical examination during follow-up. The size of the residual lesions on CT, either > 3 cm or less than or equal to 3 cm, was correlated with the presence or absence of viable residual tumor. Results Fifty-six FDG PET scans of 51 patients were assessable. All 19 cases with residual lesions > 3 cm and 35 (95%) of 37 with residual lesions less than or equal to 3 cm were correctly predicted by FDG PET. The specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG PET were 100% (95% Cl, 92% to 100%), 80% (95% Cl, 44% to 95%), 100%, and 96%, respectively, versus 74% (95% Cl, 58% to 85%), 70% (95% Cl, 34% to 90%), 37%, and 92%, respectively, for CT discrimination of the residual tumor by size (> 3 cm/less than or equal to 3 cm). Conclusion This investigation confirms that FDG PET is the best predictor of viable residual tumor in postchemotherapy seminoma residuals and should be used as a standard tool for clinical decision making in this patient group. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1039
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   ECAT ART - A continuously rotating PET camera: Performance characteristics, initial clinical studies, and installation considerations in a nuclear medicine department [J].
Bailey, DL ;
Young, H ;
Bloomfield, PM ;
Meikle, SR ;
Glass, D ;
Myers, MJ ;
Spinks, TJ ;
Watson, CC ;
Luk, P ;
Peters, AM ;
Jones, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1997, 24 (01) :6-15
[2]  
Becherer A, 2003, Q J NUCL MED, V47, P14
[3]   Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology [J].
Bomanji, J. B. ;
Costa, D. C. ;
Ell, P. J. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2001, 2 (03) :157-164
[4]   Positron emission tomography scanning with 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose as a predictor of response of neoadjuvant treatment for non-small cell carcinoma [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Ojha, B ;
Mukherjee, S ;
Pask, AH ;
Bass, CS ;
Katholi, CR .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 125 (04) :938-944
[5]   COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY WITH VINBLASTINE, IFOSFAMIDE AND CISPLATIN IN BULKY SEMINOMA [J].
CLEMM, C ;
HARTENSTEIN, R ;
WILLICH, N ;
LEDDEROSE, G ;
WILMANNS, W .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1989, 28 (02) :231-235
[6]  
Cremerius U, 1998, J NUCL MED, V39, P815
[7]   Predictive impact of 2-18fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography for residual postchemotherapy masses in patients with bulky seminoma [J].
De Santis, M ;
Bokemeyer, C ;
Becherer, A ;
Stoiber, F ;
Oechsle, K ;
Kletter, K ;
Dohmen, BM ;
Dittrich, C ;
Pont, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (17) :3740-3744
[8]  
DEGRADO TR, 1994, J NUCL MED, V35, P1398
[9]   Radiotherapy after chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma - A diminishing role [J].
Duchesne, GM ;
Stenning, SP ;
Aass, N ;
Mead, GM ;
Fossa, SD ;
Oliver, RTD ;
Horwich, A ;
Read, G ;
Roberts, IT ;
Rustin, G ;
Cullen, MH ;
Kaye, SB ;
Harland, SJ ;
Cook, PA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (06) :829-835
[10]  
Eary JF, 1999, LANCET, V354, P853