Defining a dose-response relationship with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Is more really better?

被引:34
作者
Vicini, FA
Abner, A
Baglan, KL
Kestin, LL
Martinez, AA
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[2] Mt Auburn Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cambridge, MA USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2001年 / 51卷 / 05期
关键词
radiotherapy; prostate neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen; dose; survival; biochemical control;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01799-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Data were reviewed addressing the association between radiation therapy (RT) dose and treatment outcome for localized prostate cancer to help clarify the existence of a potential dose-response relationship. Methods and Materials: Articles were identified through the MEDLINE database, CancerLit database, and reference lists of relevant articles. Studies were categorized into four groups based upon the endpoint analyzed, including biochemical control (BC), local control (LC), pathologic control (PC), and cause-specific survival (CSS). The impact of increasing RT dose with each endpoint was recorded. Results: Twenty-two trials involving a total of 11,297 patients were identified. Of the 11 trials addressing the association of RT dose with LC, 9 showed statistically significant improvements'. Of the 12 trials that reported BC with RT dose, all showed statistically significant improvements. Two out of 4 studies analyzing PC with increasing dose showed a positive correlation. Finally, 3 out of 9 studies addressing RT dose with CSS showed statistically significant improvements. Despite inconclusive results, patients with poor risk features (e.g., prostate-specific antigen [PSA] greater than or equal to 10, Gleason score [GS] greater than or equal to 7, or tumor stage greater than or equal to T2b) were most likely to benefit from increasing dose with respect to each endpoint. However, the optimal RT dose and the magnitude of benefit of dose escalation could not be identified. Conclusions: Although RT dose appears to correlate with various measures of treatment outcome, objective, high-quality data addressing this critical issue are still lacking. At the present time, the absolute improvement in outcome due to dose escalation, the subset of patients benefitting most, and the optimal dose remain to be defined. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1208
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]   PATTERNS OF CARE STUDIES - DOSE-RESPONSE OBSERVATIONS FOR LOCAL-CONTROL OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [J].
HANKS, GE ;
LEIBEL, SA ;
KRALL, JM ;
KRAMER, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1985, 11 (01) :153-157
[12]   Progress in 3D conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer [J].
Hanks, GE .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1999, 38 :69-74
[13]   Conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer [J].
Hanks, GE .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2000, 32 (01) :57-63
[14]  
Hanks GE, 1999, CANCER J, V5, P152
[15]   Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: Five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Schultheiss, TE ;
Pinover, WH ;
Movsas, B ;
Epstein, BE ;
Hunt, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (03) :501-510
[16]   Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studies [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Pinover, WH ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Price, RA ;
Schultheiss, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (04) :823-832
[17]   HYPERFRACTIONATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL FRACTIONATION IN OROPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA - FINAL ANALYSIS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF THE EORTC COOPERATIVE GROUP OF RADIOTHERAPY [J].
HORIOT, JC ;
LEFUR, R ;
NGUYEN, T ;
CHENAL, C ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
ALFONSI, S ;
GARDANI, G ;
VANDENBOGAERT, W ;
DANCZAK, S ;
BOLLA, M ;
VANGLABBEKE, M ;
DEPAUW, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 25 (04) :231-241
[18]  
Horwitz E. M., 2000, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, V48, P230, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)80253-9
[19]  
Hultenschmidt B., 1996, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, V172, P186
[20]  
ICRU, 1993, 50 ICRU, V50, P3