Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique

被引:266
作者
Daouadi, Mustapha [1 ]
Zureikat, Amer H. [1 ]
Zenati, Mazen S.
Choudry, Haroon [1 ]
Tsung, Alan
Bartlett, David L. [1 ]
Hughes, Steven J. [2 ]
Lee, Ken K. [1 ]
Moser, A. James [1 ]
Zeh, Herbert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div GI Surg Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; minimally-invasive surgery; operative time; robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy; retrospective study; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURGERY; EVOLUTION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fff08
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) reduces postoperative morbidity, hospital stay, and recovery as compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery may limit patient eligibility and require conversion to open or hand-assisted surgery to maintain patient safety. We hypothesized that robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RADP) was superior to LDP as a result of improved surgical manipulation and visualization, potentially expanding the indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between January 2004 and February 2011. We compared the perioperative outcomes, 90-day morbidity and mortality of our first 30 RADPs to 94 consecutive historical control LDPs. Results: Patients undergoing RADP and LDP demonstrated equivalent age, sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists' score, and tumor size. Postoperative length of hospital stay and rates of pancreatic fistula, blood transfusion, and readmission were not statistically different. Patients in the RADP group did not require conversion to open surgery unlike the LDP group (16%, P < 0.05) and had reduced risk of excessive blood loss. There were more pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas approached robotically (43%) than laparoscopically (15%) (P < 0.05). Oncological outcomes in these cases were superior for the robotic-assisted group with higher rates of margin negative resection and improved lymph node yield for both benign and malignant lesions (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: RADPs were equivalent to LDPs in nearly all measures of outcome and safety but significantly reduced the risk of conversion to open resection, despite a statistically greater probability of malignancy in the robotic cohort. We concluded that robotic assistance may broaden indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages?
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Chi, Hoon Sang
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (06): : 2004 - 2009
  • [12] Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Lee, Woo Jung
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (07): : 1533 - 1541
  • [13] Left-sided pancreatectomy - A multicenter comparison of Laparoscopic and open approaches
    Kooby, David A.
    Gillespie, Theresa
    Bentrem, David
    Nakeeb, Attila
    Schmidt, Max C.
    Merchant, Nipun B.
    Parikh, Alex A.
    Martin, Robert C. G., II
    Scoggins, Charles R.
    Ahmad, Syed
    Kim, Hong Jin
    Park, Jaemin
    Johnston, Fabian
    Strouch, Matthew J.
    Menze, Alex
    Rymer, Jennifer
    McClaine, Rebecca
    Strasberg, Steven M.
    Talamonti, Mark S.
    Staley, Charles A.
    McMasters, Kelly M.
    Lowy, Andrew M.
    Byrd-Sellers, Johnita
    Wood, William C.
    Hawkins, William G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (03) : 438 - 443
  • [14] Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: Results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients
    Mabrut, JY
    Fernandez-Cruz, L
    Azagra, JS
    Bassi, C
    Delvaux, G
    Weerts, J
    Fabre, JM
    Boulez, P
    Baulieux, J
    Peix, JL
    Gigot, JF
    [J]. SURGERY, 2005, 137 (06) : 597 - 605
  • [15] Update on robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Matsunaga, Garrett S.
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    Skarecky, Douglas W.
    [J]. THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2006, 6 : 2542 - 2552
  • [16] Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems
    McDougall, EM
    Soble, JJ
    Wolf, JS
    Nakada, SY
    Elashry, OM
    Clayman, RV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1996, 10 (04) : 371 - 374
  • [17] Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy - Results on a consecutive series of 58 patients
    Melotti, Gianluigi
    Butturini, Giovanni
    Piccoli, Micaela
    Casetti, Luca
    Bassi, Claudio
    Mullineris, Barbara
    Lazzaretti, Maria Grazia
    Pederzoli, Paolo
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [18] Merchant Nipun B, 2009, Adv Surg, V43, P283
  • [19] Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies
    Nigri, Giuseppe R.
    Rosman, Alan S.
    Petrucciani, Niccol
    Fancellu, Alessandro
    Pisano, Michele
    Zorcolo, Luigi
    Ramacciato, Giovanni
    Melis, Marcovalerio
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (05): : 1642 - 1651
  • [20] Prognostic factors after distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail
    Shimada, K
    Sakamoto, Y
    Sano, T
    Kosuge, T
    [J]. SURGERY, 2006, 139 (03) : 288 - 295