Stream restoration strategies for reducing river nitrogen loads

被引:238
作者
Craig, Laura S. [1 ]
Palmer, Margaret A. [1 ,2 ]
Richardson, David C. [1 ]
Filoso, Solange [2 ]
Bernhardt, Emily S. [3 ]
Bledsoe, Brian P. [4 ]
Doyle, Martin W. [5 ]
Groffman, Peter M. [6 ]
Hassett, Brooke A. [3 ]
Kaushal, Sujay S. [2 ]
Mayer, Paul M. [7 ]
Smith, Sean M. [8 ]
Wilcock, Peter R. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Solomons, MD 20688 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA
[7] US EPA, Ada, OK USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1890/070080
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 538
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico [J].
Alexander, RB ;
Smith, RA ;
Schwarz, GE .
NATURE, 2000, 403 (6771) :758-761
[2]  
Bachman L. J., 1998, U.S. Geological Survey Circular Water Resources Investigations Report
[3]  
BACHMAN LJ, 2000, FS05300 US GEOL SURV
[4]   Ecology - Synthesizing US river restoration efforts [J].
Bernhardt, ES ;
Palmer, MA ;
Allan, JD ;
Alexander, G ;
Barnas, K ;
Brooks, S ;
Carr, J ;
Clayton, S ;
Dahm, C ;
Follstad-Shah, J ;
Galat, D ;
Gloss, S ;
Goodwin, P ;
Hart, D ;
Hassett, B ;
Jenkinson, R ;
Katz, S ;
Kondolf, GM ;
Lake, PS ;
Lave, R ;
Meyer, JL ;
O'Donnell, TK ;
Pagano, L ;
Powell, B ;
Sudduth, E .
SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5722) :636-637
[5]   In-stream uptake dampens effects of major forest disturbance on watershed nitrogen export [J].
Bernhardt, ES ;
Likens, GE ;
Buso, DC ;
Driscoll, CT .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (18) :10304-10308
[6]  
Bernhardt ES, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P1689, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1689:DOCEAN]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   Nitrogen retention, removal, and saturation in lotic ecosystems [J].
Bernot, MJ ;
Dodds, WK .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2005, 8 (04) :442-453
[9]   Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern USA [J].
Boyer, EW ;
Goodale, CL ;
Jaworsk, NA ;
Howarth, RW .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 57 (01) :137-169
[10]  
Brakebill J.W., 2004, 20041433 US GEOL SUR