Stream restoration strategies for reducing river nitrogen loads

被引:238
作者
Craig, Laura S. [1 ]
Palmer, Margaret A. [1 ,2 ]
Richardson, David C. [1 ]
Filoso, Solange [2 ]
Bernhardt, Emily S. [3 ]
Bledsoe, Brian P. [4 ]
Doyle, Martin W. [5 ]
Groffman, Peter M. [6 ]
Hassett, Brooke A. [3 ]
Kaushal, Sujay S. [2 ]
Mayer, Paul M. [7 ]
Smith, Sean M. [8 ]
Wilcock, Peter R. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Solomons, MD 20688 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA
[7] US EPA, Ada, OK USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1890/070080
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 538
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[41]  
NEWBOLD JD, 2002, STROUD PRESERVE WATE
[42]   Standards for ecologically successful river restoration [J].
Palmer, MA ;
Bernhardt, ES ;
Allan, JD ;
Lake, PS ;
Alexander, G ;
Brooks, S ;
Carr, J ;
Clayton, S ;
Dahm, CN ;
Shah, JF ;
Galat, DL ;
Loss, SG ;
Goodwin, P ;
Hart, DD ;
Hassett, B ;
Jenkinson, R ;
Kondolf, GM ;
Lave, R ;
Meyer, JL ;
O'Donnell, TK ;
Pagano, L ;
Sudduth, E .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2005, 42 (02) :208-217
[43]   Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams [J].
Peterson, BJ ;
Wollheim, WM ;
Mulholland, PJ ;
Webster, JR ;
Meyer, JL ;
Tank, JL ;
Martí, E ;
Bowden, WB ;
Valett, HM ;
Hershey, AE ;
McDowell, WH ;
Dodds, WK ;
Hamilton, SK ;
Gregory, S ;
Morrall, DD .
SCIENCE, 2001, 292 (5514) :86-90
[44]  
Phillips SW, 1999, FS15099 US GEOL SURV
[45]   SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF DENITRIFICATION IN A RIPARIAN FOREST [J].
PINAY, G ;
ROQUES, L ;
FABRE, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1993, 30 (04) :581-591
[46]  
Roberts BJ, 2007, J N AM BENTHOL SOC, V26, P38, DOI 10.1899/0887-3593(2007)26[38:EOUDAI]2.0.CO
[47]  
2
[48]  
ROSIMARSHALL EJ, 2005, AM GEOPHYS UNION N A
[49]   Timing of riverine export of nitrate and phosphorus from agricultural watersheds in Illinois: Implications for reducing nutrient loading to the Mississippi River [J].
Royer, Todd V. ;
David, Mark B. ;
Gentry, Lowell E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (13) :4126-4131
[50]   Nitrogen retention in rivers: model development and application to watersheds in the northeastern USA [J].
Seitzinger, SP ;
Styles, RV ;
Boyer, EW ;
Alexander, RB ;
Billen, G ;
Howarth, RW ;
Mayer, B ;
Van Breemen, N .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 57 (01) :199-237