Steady-state kinetics and dynamics of morphine in cancer patients:: Is sedation related to the absorption rate of morphine?

被引:16
作者
Christrup, LL
Sjogren, P
Jensen, NH
Banning, AM
Elbæk, K
Ersboll, AK
机构
[1] Royal Danish Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Herlev Univ Hosp, Multidisciplinary Pain Clin, Dept Anesthesiol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[3] Nycomed Danmark, Roskilde, Denmark
[4] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Anim Sci & Anim Hlth, DK-1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
chronic pain; controlled-release tablets; morphine; morphine-3-glucuronide; morphine-6-glucuronide; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00068-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Eighteen patients suffering from chronic pain due to cancer completed a balanced, double-blind, double-dummy, two period cross-over trial comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of morphine and its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, after administration of morphine given as controlled-release (CR) tablets (every 12 h) and immediate-release (IR) tablets (every 6 h). The same total daily dose of morphine was given in both study periods. Patients received both test formulations for 4 days and on the final day of each period, peripheral venous blood samples for analysis of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide were obtained. Pain intensity sedation, and continuous reaction time (CRT) were assessed. No significant differences could be demonstrated in AUC/dose, C-min, C-max or fluctuation index values between the two treatments (IR and CR tablets) for either morphine or its metabolites. T-max for morphine and its metabolites occurred significantly later after administration of CR tablets than after administration of IR tablets. There were no significant differences between the IR and the CR formulation with respect to analgesia and side effects, and there was no difference in the patients' overall impression of the two treatments. More important, there was no difference between the T-max and the time to peak sedation after administration of IR tablets (P = 0.63). However, due to the relatively small number of patients and the variability in the data, the statistical power of the test was only 0.074. The risk of a type II error is 0.926. These data demonstrate the PK and PD similarities and differences between CR and IR morphine. They suggest that there may be a relationship between T-max (determined by absorption rate) and sedation, but further evaluation of this potential relationship is needed. (C) U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee, 1999.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   CEREBRAL EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM ORAL OPIOIDS IN CANCER-PATIENTS MEASURED BY CONTINUOUS REACTION-TIME [J].
BANNING, A ;
SJOGREN, P .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1990, 6 (02) :91-95
[2]   MORPHINE-6-GLUCURONIDE - RECEPTOR-BINDING PROFILE IN BOVINE CAUDATE-NUCLEUS [J].
CHRISTENSEN, CB ;
REIFF, L .
PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1991, 68 (02) :151-153
[3]   MORPHINE-6-GLUCURONIDE AND MORPHINE - MU-OPIOID RECEPTOR-BINDING AND EFFECTS ON DOPAMINE-SENSITIVE ADENYLATE-CYCLASE IN STRIATUM [J].
CHRISTENSEN, CB ;
MORK, A ;
GEISLER, A .
PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1991, 69 (05) :396-398
[4]   MORPHINE-6-GLUCURONIDE HAS HIGH-AFFINITY FOR THE OPIOID RECEPTOR [J].
CHRISTENSEN, CB ;
JORGENSEN, LN .
PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1987, 60 (01) :75-76
[5]  
Crowder MJ, 1990, ANAL REPEATED MEASUR
[6]  
ELSASS P, 1986, ACTA NEUROL SCAND, V73, P225
[7]   Morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide plasma concentrations and effect in cancer pain [J].
Faura, CC ;
Moore, RA ;
Horga, JF ;
Hand, CW ;
McQuay, HJ .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1996, 11 (02) :95-102
[8]   CONCENTRATIONS OF MORPHINE, MORPHINE-6-GLUCURONIDE AND MORPHINE-3-GLUCURONIDE IN SERUM AND CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID FOLLOWING MORPHINE ADMINISTRATION TO PATIENTS WITH MORPHINE-RESISTANT PAIN [J].
GOUCKE, CR ;
HACKETT, LP ;
ILETT, KF .
PAIN, 1994, 56 (02) :145-149
[9]  
HAND CW, 1987, LANCET, V2, P1207
[10]   CONTROLLED-RELEASE MORPHINE TABLETS [J].
HANKS, GW ;
ROSE, NM ;
AHERNE, GW ;
PIALL, EM ;
FAIRFIELD, S ;
TRUEMAN, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1981, 53 (12) :1259-1264