Costs of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:91
作者
Amin, Amit P. [1 ]
House, John A. [2 ]
Safley, David M. [2 ]
Chhatriwalla, Adnan K. [2 ]
Giersiefen, Helmut [3 ]
Bremer, Andreas [3 ]
Hamon, Martial [4 ]
Baklanov, Dmitri V. [2 ]
Aluko, Akinyele [5 ]
Wohns, David [6 ]
Mathias, David W. [7 ]
Applegate, Robert A. [8 ]
Cohen, David J. [2 ]
Marso, Steven P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Barnes Jewish Hosp, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Univ Missouri, St Lukes Mid Amer Heart Inst, Kansas City, MO 64111 USA
[3] ViTA Solut, Parsippany, NJ USA
[4] Univ Hosp Caen, Caen, France
[5] Presbyterian Hosp, Charlotte, NC USA
[6] Spectrum Hlth, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[7] Aurora Baycare Med Ctr, Green Bay, WI USA
[8] Wake Forest Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
关键词
catheterization; costs; femoral artery; outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention; radial artery; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; FEMORAL ACCESS; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; LEARNING-CURVE; OUTCOMES; PREVALENCE; TRENDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study sought to evaluate the costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention (TFI) from a contemporary hospital perspective. Background Whereas the TRI approach to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to reduce access-site complications compared with TFI, whether it is associated with lower costs is unknown. Methods TRI and TFI patients were identified at 5 U.S. centers. The primary outcome was the cost of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) hospitalization, defined as cost on the day of PCI through hospital discharge. Cost was obtained from each hospital's cost accounting system. Independent costs of TRI were identified using propensity-scoring methods with inverse probability weighting. Secondary outcomes of interest were bleeding, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay, which were stratified by pre-procedural risk and PCI indication. Results In 7,121 PCI procedures performed from January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2011, TRI was performed in 1,219 (17%) patients and was associated with shorter lengths of stay (2.5 vs. 3.0 days; p < 0.001) and lower bleeding events (1.1% vs. 2.4%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34 to 0.79; p = 0.002). TRI was associated with a total cost savings of $830 (95% CI: $296 to $1,364; p < 0.001), of which $130 (95% CI: -$99 to $361; p = 0.112) were procedural savings and $705 (95% CI: $212 to $1,238; p < 0.001) were post-procedural savings. There was an associated graded increase in savings among patients at higher predicted risk of bleeding: low risk: $642 (95% CI: $43 to $1,236; p = 0.035); moderate risk: $706 (95% CI: $104 to $1,308; p = 0.029); and high risk: $1,621 (95% CI: $271 to $ 2,971, p = 0.039). Conclusions TRI was associated with a cost savings exceeding $ 800 per patient relative to TFI. Increased adoption of TRI may result in cost savings at hospitals. (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 834
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]  
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 2009, DARTM ATL HLTH CAR A
[12]   Mechanism and Predictors of Failed Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions [J].
Dehghani, Payam ;
Mohammad, Atif ;
Bajaj, Ravi ;
Hong, Tony ;
Suen, Colin M. ;
Sharieff, Waseem ;
Chisholm, Robert J. ;
Kutryk, Michael J. B. ;
Fam, Neil P. ;
Cheema, Asim N. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (11) :1057-1064
[13]   A Contemporary View of Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States [J].
Dehmer, Gregory J. ;
Weaver, Douglas ;
Roe, Matthew T. ;
Milford-Beland, Sarah ;
Fitzgerald, Susan ;
Hermann, Anthony ;
Messenger, John ;
Moussa, Issam ;
Garratt, Kirk ;
Rumsfeld, John ;
Brindis, Ralph G. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (20) :2017-2031
[14]  
Fise Peter, 2012, J Contemp Health Law Policy, V28, P296
[15]   A single center experience with same-day transradial-PCI patients: A contrast with published guidelines [J].
Gilchrist, Ian C. ;
Rhodes, Denise A. ;
Zimmerman, Helen E. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 79 (04) :583-587
[16]   Fee-For-Service Will Remain A Feature Of Major Payment Reforms, Requiring More Changes In Medicare Physician Payment [J].
Ginsburg, Paul B. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (09) :1977-1983
[17]  
Hagland Mark, 2011, Healthc Inform, V28, P10
[18]   Choice of arterial access site and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy: the ACUITY trial [J].
Hamon, Martial ;
Rasmussen, Lars H. ;
Manoukian, Steven V. ;
Cequier, Angel ;
Lincoff, A. Michael ;
Rupprecht, Hans-Juergen ;
Gersh, Bernard J. ;
Mann, Tift ;
Bertrand, Michel E. ;
Mehran, Roxana ;
Stone, Gregg W. .
EUROINTERVENTION, 2009, 5 (01) :115-120
[19]   The transradial versus the transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Jang, Jae-Sik ;
Jin, Han-Young ;
Seo, Jeong-Sook ;
Yang, Tae-Hyun ;
Kim, Dae-Kyeong ;
Kim, Dong-Kie ;
Kim, Doo-Il ;
Cho, Kyoung-Im ;
Kim, Bo-Hyun ;
Park, Yong Hyun ;
Je, Hyung-Gon ;
Kim, Dong-Soo .
EUROINTERVENTION, 2012, 8 (04) :501-510
[20]   Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial [J].
Jolly, Sanjit S. ;
Yusuf, Salim ;
Cairns, John ;
Niemela, Kari ;
Xavier, Denis ;
Widimsky, Petr ;
Budaj, Andrzej ;
Niemela, Matti ;
Valentin, Vicent ;
Lewis, Basil S. ;
Avezum, Alvaro ;
Steg, Philippe Gabriel ;
Rao, Sunil V. ;
Gao, Peggy ;
Afzal, Rizwan ;
Joyner, Campbell D. ;
Chrolavicius, Susan ;
Mehta, Shamir R. .
LANCET, 2011, 377 (9775) :1409-1420