Dual triggering improves the accuracy of left ventricular volume measurements by contrast-enhanced real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography

被引:33
作者
Caiani, EG
Coon, P
Corsi, C
Goonewardena, S
Bardo, D
Rafter, P
Sugeng, L
Mor-Avi, V
Lang, RM
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Med Ctr, Noninvas Cardiac Imaging Lab, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Bioengn, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Elettron Informat & Sistemist, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[4] Philips Med Syst, Andover, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.echo.2005.06.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic continuous imaging (CIM) with contrast underestimates left ventricular (LV) volumes. We studied the effects of dual-triggered (DT) acquisition on the accuracy of LV volume measurements for patients with poor acoustic windows. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic imaging was performed in 20 patients during LV opacification (Definity) on the same day as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Both CIM and DT data were analyzed using custom software to calculate end-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV), which were compared with the cardiac magnetic resonance reference. CIM correlated well with the cardiac magnetic resonance reference (EDV. r = 0.89; ESV: r = 0.93), but underestimated EDV and ESV by 17% and 19%, respectively. In contrast, DT resulted in higher correlation (EDV. r = 0.95; ESV- r = 0.96) and smaller biases (9% and 6%, respectively). in conclusion, because the accuracy of LV volume measurements depends on the acquisition strategy of contrast-enhanced real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic images, the use of DT instead of the conventional CIM acquisition is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:1292 / 1298
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[31]   Dobutamine stress echocardiography: Improved endocardial border definition and wall motion analysis with tissue harmonic imaging [J].
Zaglavara, T ;
Norton, M ;
Cumberledge, B ;
Morris, D ;
Irvine, T ;
Cummins, C ;
Schuster, J ;
Kenny, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 1999, 12 (09) :706-713