Measures of familial aggregation depend on definition of family history: meta-analysis for colorectal cancer

被引:73
作者
Baglietto, L
Jenkins, MA
Severi, G
Giles, GG
Bishop, DT
Boyle, P
Hopper, JL
机构
[1] Canc Council Victoria, Canc Epidemiol Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Mol Environm Genet & Analyt Epidemiol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] St James Univ Hosp, Canc Res UK Clin Ctr, Genet Epidemiol Div, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
family history; risk; meta-analysis; colorectal neoplasms;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.018
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Familial aggregation, a primary theme in genetic epidemiology, can be estimated from family studies based on an index person. The excess risk due to the presence of affected family members can be classified according to whether disease in the relatives is considered a risk factor for the index person (type I relative risk) or whether the disease status of the index person is considered a risk factor for the relatives (type 11 relative risk). Study Design and Setting: A meta-analysis of published colorectal cancer studies reporting a measure of familial association was performed and application of multilevel linear regression to model age-specific relative risks presented. Results: The pooled type I relative risk of colorectal cancer given any affected first-degree relative (based on 20 studies) was 2.26 (95% confidence interval CI = 1.86, 2.73) and decreased with the age of the consultand. The pooled type 11 estimate (based on seven studies) was 2.81 (95% CI = 2.05, 3.85). Conclusion: Type I relative risks are useful in clinical counseling settings when a consultand wants to know his/her disease risk given his or her family history. Type 11 relative risks can be used to quantify the risk of disease to relatives of an affected individual and then identify subjects eligible for screening. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 124
页数:11
相关论文
共 85 条
[21]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[22]   FAMILY INCIDENCE OF CARCINOMA OF THE COLON AND RECTUM IN NORTHEAST SCOTLAND [J].
DUNCAN, JL ;
KYLE, J .
GUT, 1982, 23 (02) :169-171
[23]   FAMILIAL COLORECTAL-CANCER AND THE SCREENING OF FAMILY MEMBERS [J].
FISHER, G ;
ARMSTRONG, B .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1989, 150 (01) :22-25
[24]  
Fleiss J L, 1993, Stat Methods Med Res, V2, P121, DOI 10.1177/096228029300200202
[25]   To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk [J].
Forrest, K ;
Simpson, SA ;
Wilson, BJ ;
van Teijlingen, ER ;
McKee, L ;
Haites, N ;
Matthews, E .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2003, 64 (04) :317-326
[26]   A pilot study on risk factors and p53 gene expression in colorectal cancer [J].
Fredrikson, M ;
Axelson, O ;
Sun, XF ;
Arbman, G ;
Nilsson, E ;
Nordenskjold, B ;
Sjodahl, R ;
Soderkvist, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 73 (11) :1428-1430
[27]  
Freedman AN, 1996, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V5, P285
[28]   A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF FAMILY HISTORY AND THE RISK OF COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
FUCHS, CS ;
GIOVANNUCCI, EL ;
COLDITZ, GA ;
HUNTER, DJ ;
SPEIZER, FE ;
WILLETT, WC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (25) :1669-1674
[29]   Epidemiology of sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, medical history, and colon cancer: A case-control study among French Canadians in Montreal [J].
Ghadirian, P ;
Maisonneuve, P ;
Perret, C ;
Lacroix, A ;
Boyle, P .
CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 1998, 22 (05) :396-404
[30]   SYSTEMATIC POPULATION-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CANCER RISK IN FIRST-DEGREE RELATIVES OF CANCER PROBANDS [J].
GOLDGAR, DE ;
EASTON, DF ;
CANNONALBRIGHT, LA ;
SKOLNICK, MH .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (21) :1600-1608