Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units - Opportunities for improvement

被引:244
作者
White, Douglas B.
Braddock, Clarence H., III
Bereknyei, Sylvia
Curtis, J. Randall
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Med, Program Med Eth, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.167.5.461
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In North America, families generally wish to be involved in end-of-life decisions when the patient cannot participate, yet little is known about the extent to which shared decision making occurs in intensive care units. Methods: We audiotaped 51 physician-family conferences about major end-of-life treatment decisions at 4 hospitals from August 1, 2000, to July 31, 2002. We measured shared decision making using a previously validated instrument to assess the following 10 elements: discussing the nature of the decision, describing treatment alternatives, discussing the pros and cons of the choices, discussing uncertainty, assessing family understanding, eliciting patient values and preferences, discussing the family's role in decision making, assessing the need for input from others, exploring the context of the decision, and eliciting the family's opinion about the treatment decision. We used a mixed-effects regression model to determine predictors of shared decision making and to evaluate whether higher levels of shared decision making were associated with greater family satisfaction. Results: Only 2% (1/51) of decisions met all 10 criteria for shared decision making. The most frequently addressed elements were the nature of the decision (100%) and the context of the decision to be made (92%). The least frequently addressed elements were the family's role in decision making (31%) and an assessment of the family's understanding of the decision (25%). In multivariate analysis, lower family educational level was associated with less shared decision making (partial correlation coefficient, 0.34; standardized beta .3; P=. 02). Higher levels of shared decision making were associated with greater family satisfaction with communication (partial correlation coefficient, 0.15; standardized beta .09; P=. 03). Conclusions: Shared decision making about end-of-life treatment choices was often incomplete, especially among less educated families. Higher levels of shared decision making were associated with greater family satisfaction. Shared decision making may be an important area for quality improvement in intensive care units.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 467
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Families looking back: One year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support [J].
Abbott, KH ;
Sago, JG ;
Breen, CM ;
Abernethy, AP ;
Tulsky, JA .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (01) :197-201
[2]   Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study [J].
Angus, DC ;
Barnato, AE ;
Linde-Zwirble, WT ;
Weissfeld, LA ;
Watson, RS ;
Rickert, T ;
Rubenfeld, GD .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (03) :638-643
[3]   Informed decision making in outpatient practice - Time to get back to basics [J].
Braddock, CH ;
Edwards, KA ;
Hasenberg, NM ;
Laidley, TL ;
Levinson, W .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24) :2313-2320
[4]   Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units [J].
Breen, CM ;
Abernethy, AP ;
Abbott, KH ;
Tulsky, JA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 16 (05) :283-289
[5]   Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU - Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003 [J].
Carlet, J ;
Thijs, LG ;
Antonelli, M ;
Cassell, J ;
Cox, P ;
Hill, N ;
Hinds, C ;
Pimentel, JM ;
Reinhart, K ;
Thompson, BT .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 30 (05) :770-784
[6]   Surveys to assess satisfaction with end-of-life care: Does timing matter? [J].
Casarett, DJ ;
Crowley, R ;
Hirschman, KB .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 25 (02) :128-132
[7]   What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? [J].
Charles, C ;
Whelan, T ;
Gafni, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212) :780-782
[8]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661
[9]   Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units [J].
Cohen, S ;
Sprung, C ;
Sjokvist, P ;
Lippert, A ;
Ricou, B ;
Baras, M ;
Hovilehto, S ;
Maia, P ;
Phelan, D ;
Reinhart, K ;
Werdan, K ;
Bulow, HH ;
Woodcock, T .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (09) :1215-1221
[10]   Impact on family satisfaction - The critical care family assistance program [J].
Dowling, J ;
Wang, BF .
CHEST, 2005, 128 (03) :76S-80S