Prenatal diagnosis:: molecular genetics and cytogenetics

被引:7
作者
Bui, TH [1 ]
Blennow, E
Nordenskjöld, M
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Karolinska Hosp, Dept Mol Med, Clin Genet Unit,Prenatal Diag Programme, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Karolinska Hosp, Dept Mol Med, Clin Genet Unit,Genet Consultat Serv, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Huddinge Univ Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Ctr Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
prenatal diagnosis; DNA; mutation analysis; FISH; interphase FISH; multicolour FISH; structural chromosome aberration; numerical chromosome aberration; marker chromosome; QF-PCR;
D O I
10.1053/beog.2002.0327
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The technologies developed for the Human Genome Project, the recent surge of available DNA sequences resulting from it and the increasing pace of gene discoveries and characterization have all contributed to new technical platforms that have enhanced the spectrum of disorders that can be diagnosed prenatally. The importance of determining the disease-causing mutation or the informativeness of linked genetic markers before embarking upon a DNA-based prenatal diagnosis is, however, still emphasized. Different fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technologies provide increased resolution for the elucidation of structural chromosome abnormalities that cannot be resolved by more conventional cytogenetic analyses, including microdeletion syndromes, cryptic or subtle duplications and translocations, complex rearrangements involving many chromosomes, and marker chromosomes. Interphase FISH and the quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction are efficient tools for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of selected aneuploidies, the latter being considered to be most cost-effective if analyses are performed on a large scale. There is some debate surrounding whether this approach should be employed as an adjunct to karyotyping or whether it should be used as a stand-alone test in selected groups of women.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 643
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Prenatal detection of chromosome disorders by QF-PCR [J].
Adinolfi, M ;
Sherlock, J .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9287) :1030-1031
[2]  
Adinolfi M, 2000, COMMUNITY GENET, V3, P50
[3]   The clinical significance of fetal echogenic bowel [J].
Al-Kouatly, HB ;
Chasen, ST ;
Streltzoff, J ;
Chervenak, FA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (05) :1035-1038
[4]  
Anderlid BM, 2001, AM J MED GENET, V99, P223, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(2001)9999:9999<::AID-AJMG1146>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-W
[6]   Strategies for signal amplification in nucleic acid detection [J].
Andras, SC ;
Power, JB ;
Cocking, EC ;
Davey, MR .
MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 19 (01) :29-44
[7]   Disease-causing mutations in the human genome [J].
Antonarakis, SE ;
Krawczak, M ;
Cooper, DN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2000, 159 (Suppl 3) :S173-S178
[8]   Advances in the detection of chromosomal aberrations using spectral karyotyping [J].
Bayani, J ;
Squire, JA .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2001, 59 (02) :65-73
[9]   Individuals with abnormal phenotype and normal G-banding karyotype: improvement and limitations in the diagnosis by the use of 24-colour FISH [J].
Bezrookove, V ;
Hansson, K ;
van der Burg, M ;
van der Smagt, JJ ;
Hilhorst-Hofstee, Y ;
Wiegant, J ;
Beverstock, GC ;
Raap, AK ;
Tanke, H ;
Breuning, MH ;
Rosenberg, C .
HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 106 (04) :392-398
[10]   Prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies using quantitative fluorescent PCR [J].
Bili, C ;
Divane, A ;
Apessos, A ;
Konstantinos, T ;
Apostolos, A ;
Ioannis, B ;
Periklis, T ;
Florentin, L .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2002, 22 (05) :360-365