Laparoscope-assisted appendectomy in children: The two-trocar technique

被引:19
作者
Valioulis, I [1 ]
Hameury, F [1 ]
Dahmani, L [1 ]
Levard, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Poitiers, Dept Pediat Surg, F-86021 Poitiers, France
关键词
appendicitis; laparoscopic appendectomy; child;
D O I
10.1055/s-2001-19726
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The conventional cannulae position in laparoscopic appendectomy does not permit good visualization of the appendix, especially if it is in a retrocaecal or pelvic position. In children, the smaller dimension of the peritoneal cavity aggravates this problem. Method: In order to optimize appendix visualization; we propose a modification of the cannulae position associated with extraabdominal appendectomy. Two trocars are inserted, one in the umbilicus under direct vision and one in the midline above the pubic symphysis. The telescope is inserted in the second cannula. The appendix is delivered via the umbilical trocar incision and a conventional appendectomy is performed. Results: During a one-year period, 38 appendectomies were performed. In 29 cases (76.3%) the technique was successful. In 9 patients (4 with peritonitis, 4 with a retrocaecal and one with a pelvic appendix) a third trocar was necessary to complete the operation. We had two conversions (5.2%), one to open surgery and one to intraabdominal laparoscopic appendectomy. Mean operation time was 19 min. There were two infectious complications (one parietal and one intraabdominal). Conclusions: The excellent visualization permitted considerable time gain. Infectious complications were also low. This method is suggested as an alternative procedure for appendectomy, especially in children, because of their favorable anatomy.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 394
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF 8651 APPENDICECTOMIES IN ENGLAND AND WALES DURING 1992 [J].
BAIGRIE, RJ ;
DEHN, TCB ;
FOWLER, SM ;
DUNN, DC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (07) :933-933
[2]   Does pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy increase bacterial translocation? [J].
Evasovich, MR ;
Clark, TC ;
Horattas, MC ;
Holda, S ;
Treen, L .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1996, 10 (12) :1176-1179
[3]  
Fabiani P, 1996, ANN CHIR, V50, P892
[4]  
Frazee RC, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P509
[5]   Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy [J].
Garbutt, JM ;
Soper, NJ ;
Shannon, WD ;
Botero, A ;
Littenberg, B .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 9 (01) :17-26
[6]   IS THERE A ROLE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY IN PEDIATRIC-SURGERY [J].
GILCHRIST, BF ;
LOBE, TE ;
SCHROPP, KP ;
KAY, GA ;
HIXSON, SD ;
WRENN, EL ;
PHILIPPE, PG ;
HOLLABAUGH, RS .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1992, 27 (02) :209-214
[7]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis [J].
Golub, R ;
Siddiqui, F ;
Pohl, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (05) :545-553
[8]   MODIFIED LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY IN SURGERY - A REPORT ON 388 OPERATIONS [J].
GOTZ, F ;
PIER, A ;
BACHER, C .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1990, 4 (01) :6-9
[9]  
Grandjean JP, 1999, ANN CHIR, V53, P280
[10]   Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy [J].
Hellberg, A ;
Rudberg, C ;
Kullman, E ;
Enochsson, L ;
Fenyö, G ;
Graffner, H ;
Hallerbäck, B ;
Johansson, B ;
Anderberg, B ;
Wenner, J ;
Ringqvist, I ;
Sörensen, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (01) :48-53