Effect of shared contraceptive experiences on IUD use at an urban abortion clinic

被引:21
作者
Benson, Lyndsey S. [1 ,2 ]
Perrucci, Alissa [2 ]
Drey, Eleanor A. [2 ]
Steinauer, Jody E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco SFGH, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
关键词
Postabortion contraception; Intrauterine devices; Social networking; Shared personal experiences; Postabortion IUD use; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2011.05.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Background: We studied the effect of contraceptive social networking on postabortion intrauterine device (IUD) uptake. This study explores whether women who have heard personal stories of IUD use are more likely to use an IUD for postabortion contraception. Study Design: We surveyed 299 women undergoing induced abortion at San Francisco General Hospital's Women's Options Center before and after contraceptive counseling. Both English- and Spanish-speaking women, aged 15 years and older, were surveyed. Results: Fifty percent of women surveyed chose to use an IUD for postabortion contraception. Women choosing IUDs were more likely than women choosing other contraceptives or no contraceptives to be multiparous, Latina and interested in IUDs prior to contraceptive counseling. Disclosure of personal IUD use by a clinic staff member was independently associated with the decision to use an IUD (odds ratio 8.1, 95% confidence interval 3.8-17.2). Conclusions: Women undergoing abortion in an urban clinic have knowledge and high acceptance of IUDs, and sharing of contraceptive experiences is common among women of all demographics. Controlling for demographics and prior knowledge of IUDs, sharing of personal IUD experiences by providers is significantly associated with IUD use. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, 2005, Obstet Gynecol, V105, P223
[2]
[Anonymous], 2004, MED EL CRIT CONTR US, VThird
[3]
[Anonymous], 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[4]
Curtis Kathryn M., 2010, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V59, P1
[5]
Insertion of intrauterine contraceptives immediately following first- and second-trimester abortions [J].
Drey, Eleanor A. ;
Reeves, Matthew F. ;
Ogawa, Dawn D. ;
Sokoloff, Abby ;
Darney, Philip D. ;
Steinauer, Jody E. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 79 (05) :397-402
[6]
Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001 [J].
Finer, Larence B. ;
Henshaw, Stanley K. .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2006, 38 (02) :90-96
[7]
Guttmacher Institute, FACTS IND AB US BRIE
[8]
Abortion in the United States: Incidence and access to services, 2005 [J].
Jones, Rachel K. ;
Zolna, Mia R. S. ;
Stanley, K. ;
Henshaw ;
Finer, Lawrence B. .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2008, 40 (01) :6-16
[9]
Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000-2001 [J].
Jones, RK ;
Darroch, JE ;
Henshaw, SK .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2002, 34 (05) :226-235
[10]
Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda [J].
Moos, MK ;
Bartholomew, NE ;
Lohr, KN .
CONTRACEPTION, 2003, 67 (02) :115-132