Institutional h-index: The performance of a new metric in the evaluation of Brazilian Psychiatric Post-graduation Programs

被引：28

作者：

da Luz, Mariana Pires ^{[1
,2
]}

Marques-Portella, Carla ^{[1
,2
]}

Mendlowicz, Mauro ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Gleiser, Sonia ^{[2
]}

Freire Coutinho, Evandro Silva

Figueira, Ivan ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Psychiat, IPUB, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Integrated Lab Stress Res, IPUB, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

[3] Univ Fed Fluminense, Dept Psychiat & Mental Hlth, MSM, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil

来源：

SCIENTOMETRICS | 2008年 / 77卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/s11192-007-1964-9

中图分类号：

TP39 [计算机的应用];

学科分类号：

081203 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

A fair assessment of merit is needed for better resource allocation in the scientific community. We analyzed the performance of the institutional h-index in the case of Brazilian Psychiatry Post-graduation Programs. Traditional bibliometric indicators and the institutional h-index similarly ranked the programs, except for the Average Impact Factor. The institutional h-index correlated strongly with the majority of the traditional bibliometric indicators, which did not occur with the Average Impact Factor. The institutional h-index balances "quantity" and "quality", and can be used as part of a panel of bibliometric indicators to aid the peer-review process.

引用

页码：361 / 368

页数：8

共 30 条

[1]

AMIN M, 2000, PERSPECTIVES PUBLISH, V1

[2] The impact factor game - It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature [J].

不详 .

PLOS MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (06) :707-708

[3] Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? [J].

Bornmann, L ;

Daniel, HD .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 65 (03) :391-392

[4] Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index -: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors [J].

Bornmann, Lutz ;

Daniel, Hans-Dieter .

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (03) :204-213

[5]

Braun T, 2005, SCIENTIST, V19, P8

[6] The modest but growing Brazilian presence in psychiatric, psychobiological and mental health research: assessment of the 1998-2002 period [J].

Bressan, RA ;

Gerolin, J ;

Mari, JJ .

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 38 (05) :649-659

[7] What's in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers) [J].

Cheek, J ;

Garnham, B ;

Quan, J .

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (03) :423-435

[8] The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level [J].

Costas, Rodrigo ;

Bordons, Maria .

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (03) :193-203

[9] Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists [J].

Cronin, Blaise ;

Meho, Lokman .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 57 (09) :1275-1278

[10] Scientific indicators of productivity - time for action [J].

Dainesi, Sonia Mansoldo ;

Pietrobon, Ricardo .

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2007, 29 (02) :100-101

← 1 2 3 →