MORAL CHARACTER IN NEGOTIATION

被引:9
作者
Morse, Lily [1 ]
Cohen, Taya R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Tepper Sch Business, Org Behav & Theory, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
INTERINDIVIDUAL-INTERGROUP DISCONTINUITY; DARK TRIAD; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; HONESTY-HUMILITY; PRONENESS; BEHAVIOR; OUTCOMES; GUILT; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.5465/amp.2017.0051
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, we discuss the role of moral character in negotiation and identify open questions and promising directions for future scholars to explore. We advance research in this area by introducing a dyadic model of moral character in negotiation that highlights the joint influence of each party's moral character on negotiation attitudes, motives, and behaviors. We discuss the implications of our model and conclude that personality science-especially the study of moral character-has great potential to enhance research and practice in negotiations. Our hope is that this work will accelerate theoretical development and empirical studies that address the question of how moral character influences negotiation processes and outcomes-from pre-negotiation (e.g., planning, selecting negotiating partners) to actual bargaining (e.g., bargaining tactics, concessions) to post-negotiation (e.g., deal implementation, long-term consequences, relationship building and maintenance, reputations)-and provide a spring-board for future studies on this topic.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 25
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[31]   Paying a Price: Culture, Trust, and Negotiation Consequences [J].
Gunia, Brian C. ;
Brett, Jeanne M. ;
Nandkeolyar, Amit K. ;
Kamdar, Dishan .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 96 (04) :774-789
[32]  
Haidt J., 2007, Social Justice Research, V20, P98, DOI [10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z, DOI 10.1007/S11211-007-0034-Z]
[33]   The salience of a recipient's alternatives: Inter- and intrapersonal comparison in ultimatum games [J].
Handgraaf, MJJ ;
van Dijk, E ;
Wilke, HAM ;
Vermunt, RC .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 90 (01) :165-177
[34]   Agreement on the Perception of Moral Character [J].
Helzer, Erik G. ;
Furr, R. Michael ;
Hawkins, Ashley ;
Barranti, Maxwell ;
Blackie, Laura E. R. ;
Fleeson, William .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2014, 40 (12) :1698-1710
[35]   Does Moral Identity Effectively Predict Moral Behavior?: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Hertz, Steven G. ;
Krettenauer, Tobias .
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 20 (02) :129-140
[36]   When the cat's away, some mice will play: A basic trait account of dishonest behavior [J].
Hilbig, Benjamin E. ;
Zettler, Ingo .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2015, 57 :72-88
[37]   From personality to altruistic behavior (and back): Evidence from a double-blind dictator game [J].
Hilbig, Benjamin E. ;
Thielmann, Isabel ;
Hepp, Johanna ;
Klein, Sina A. ;
Zettler, Ingo .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2015, 55 :46-50
[38]   Personality and Prosocial Behavior: Linking Basic Traits and Social Value Orientations [J].
Hilbig, Benjamin E. ;
Gloeckner, Andreas ;
Zettler, Ingo .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 107 (03) :529-539
[39]   It takes two: Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation [J].
Hilbig, Benjamin E. ;
Zettler, Ingo ;
Leist, Felix ;
Heydasch, Timo .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2013, 54 (05) :598-603
[40]   Personality, Punishment and Public Goods: Strategic Shifts Towards Cooperation as a Matter of Dispositional Honesty-Humility [J].
Hilbig, Benjamin E. ;
Zettler, Ingo ;
Heydasch, Timo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2012, 26 (03) :245-254