Effectiveness of new agri-environment schemes in providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes

被引:126
作者
Pywell, RF
Warman, EA
Hulmes, L
Hulmes, S
Nuttall, P
Sparks, TH
Critchley, CNR
Sherwood, A
机构
[1] NERC, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Huntingdon PE28 2LS, Cambs, England
[2] ADAS Consulting Ltd, ADAS Redesdale, Otterburn NE19 1SB, Northd, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
keystone species; pollen and nectar resources; habitat restoration; field margins;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.034
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Intensive farming has contributed to the serious declines in abundance and geographic range suffered by several bumblebee species in Europe and North America. Recent UK agri-environmental policy aims to conserve and restore bumblebee populations by providing foraging habitats on arable field margins. We examined the effectiveness of strategies to achieve this, including sowing seed mixtures of (1) tussocky grass species, (2) wildflowers and (3) pollen- and nectar-rich plants. These were compared to conventionally managed cereal crops. Sampling was undertaken in 32 10 x 10 km squares throughout England, each containing a sample of the different field margin types. Bumblebee abundance in July and August was significantly higher on pollen and nectar margins (86 +/- 14 bees per 100 m) compared with wildflower margins (43 +/- 14), mature grass margins (6 +/- 14) and recently sown grass margins (8 +/- 4). Bees were virtually absent from the cereal crop (0.2 +/- 0.1). Bumblebee species richness was significantly higher on margins sown with either wildflowers or the pollen and nectar mix. There was evidence that richness of the bumblebee assemblage at the 10 x 10 km square scale was positively correlated with land use heterogeneity, the proportion of grassland, and the abundance and richness of dicotyledon flowers. The abundance of long-tongued bees per margin was explained by the number of pollen and nectar agreements per 10 x 10 km square, together with flower abundance. Future research is required to determine the quantity and location of foraging habitat required to sustain bumblebee populations at the landscape scale. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 206
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [41] ROBIN M, 2002, J HETEROCYCLIC CHEM, V39, P1
  • [42] RYAN BF, 2000, MINITAB HDB
  • [43] Large-scale changes in the abundance of common higher plant species across Britain between 1978, 1990 and 1998 as a consequence of human activity: Tests of hypothesised changes in trait representation
    Smart, SM
    Bunce, RGH
    Marrs, R
    LeDuc, M
    Firbank, LG
    Maskell, LC
    Scott, WA
    Thompson, K
    Walker, KJ
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 124 (03) : 355 - 371
  • [44] Sotherton N.W., 1991, P373
  • [45] Stace C., 1997, NEW FLORA BRIT ISLES, Vsecond
  • [46] Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscape
    Svensson, B
    Lagerlöf, J
    Svensson, BG
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 77 (03) : 247 - 255
  • [47] Ter Braak C. J. F., 1998, Canoco reference manual and user's guide. Software for ordination (version 5.10)
  • [48] Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale
    Westphal, C
    Steffan-Dewenter, I
    Tscharntke, T
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2003, 6 (11) : 961 - 965
  • [49] WESTRICH P, 1996, LINNEAN SOC S SERIES, V18
  • [50] Does specialization explain rarity and decline British bumblebees? - A response to Goulson et al.
    Williams, P
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 122 (01) : 33 - 43