Misclassification and discordance of measured blood pressure from patient's true blood pressure in current clinical practice: a clinical trial simulation case study

被引:14
作者
Jin, Yuyan [4 ]
Bies, Robert [3 ]
Gastonguay, Marc R. [2 ]
Stockbridge, Norman [1 ]
Gobburu, Jogarao [5 ,6 ]
Madabushi, Rajanikanth [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, CDER, FDA, WO51,RM2172, Silver Spring, MD 20903 USA
[2] Metrum Inst, Tariffville, CT USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Div Clin Pharmacol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Pfizer Inc, Clin Pharmacol, PharmaTherapeut Clin Res, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Sch Pharm, Ctr Translat Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[6] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Ctr Translat Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Hypertension; Sphygmomanometer; Circadian rhythm; Modeling and simulation; Blood pressure misclassification; Blood pressure calibration; Public health; HYPERTENSION; ERROR; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; AWARENESS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10928-012-9250-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Treatment decisions for hypertension using sphygmomanometer based measurements and the current clinical practice paradigm do not account for the timing of blood pressure (BP) measurement. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical implications of discordance between measured and true BP, to quantify BP misclassification rate at a typical clinical visit in current clinical practice, and to propose a BP calibration system to decrease the impact of timing of BP measurement. A clinical trial simulation case study was performed using an in silico Monte Carlo Simulation approach. The time-courses of BPs with and without an antihypertensive treatment effect were simulated from a baseline BP model combined with an antihypertensive PK/PD model. Virtual subject characteristics were sampled from the FDA internal database. The baseline BP model was qualified using observed 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) data from 225 subjects by a visual predictive check as well as a global sensitivity analysis. First of all, our results showed that the measured cuff BP in current typical clinical practice deviated from the true values. (1) Cuff BP deviated from the true values by more than 5 mmHg in 57 % (95 % CI: 54-61 %) of patients and more than 10 mmHg in 26 % (95 % CI: 22-32 %) of patients respectively. (2) These discordances were reduced to 28 % (deviation a parts per thousand yen5 mmHg, 95 % CI: 18-40 %) and 9 % (deviation a parts per thousand yen10 mmHg, 95 % CI: 4-18%) of patients assuming perfect sphygmomanometer measurement and thus represent the contribution of ignoring the daily circadian rhythm of BP. Secondly, our results showed 23-32 % of patients were misclassified to an incorrect BP category for a casual clinical visit based on JNC 7 guideline. In addition, the accuracy of the measured cuff BP varied by time of clinic visit. Specifically, 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM was identified to be the better time frame, while times before 9:00 AM were the worst time frame. Therefore, clinic visit time may need to be adjusted accordingly. Finally, we proposed an easy BP calibration method for clinic use to adjust for time of day differences due to circadian variability in case that the desirable clinic visit time cannot be tailored for practical reasons.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 294
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Evaluation of the placebo effect and reproducibility of blood pressure measurement in hypertension [J].
Asmar, R ;
Safar, M ;
Queneau, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 14 (06) :546-552
[3]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[4]   General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care - The Framingham Heart Study [J].
D'Agostino, Ralph B. ;
Vasan, Ramachandran S. ;
Pencina, Michael J. ;
Wolf, Philip A. ;
Cobain, Mark ;
Massaro, Joseph M. ;
Kannel, William B. .
CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (06) :743-753
[5]   US Trends in Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension, 1988-2008 [J].
Egan, Brent M. ;
Zhao, Yumin ;
Axon, R. Neal .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (20) :2043-2050
[6]  
Gibiansky L, 2006, POP APPR GROUP EUR
[7]   Determinants of masked hypertension in the general population: the Finn-Home study [J].
Hanninen, Marjo-Riitta A. ;
Niiranen, Teemu J. ;
Puukka, Pauli J. ;
Mattila, Aino K. ;
Jula, Antti M. .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 29 (10) :1880-1888
[8]   Are two really better than one? Empirical examination of repeat blood pressure measurements and stroke risk in the Renfrew/Pitisley and collaborative studies [J].
Hart, CL ;
Hole, DJ ;
Smith, GD .
STROKE, 2001, 32 (11) :2697-2699
[9]   Nonsymmetrical double logistic analysis of ambulatory blood pressure recordings [J].
Head, GA ;
Reid, CM ;
Lukoshkova, EV .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 98 (04) :1511-1518
[10]   Rate of morning increase in blood pressure is elevated in hypertensives [J].
Head, Geoffrey A. ;
Reid, Christopher M. ;
Shiel, Louise M. ;
Jennings, Garry L. ;
Lukoshkova, Elena V. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2006, 19 (10) :1010-1017