Marine conservation planning in practice: lessons learned from the Gulf of California

被引:29
作者
Alvarez-Romero, Jorge G. [1 ]
Pressey, Robert L. [1 ]
Ban, Natalie C. [1 ]
Torre-Cosio, Jorge [2 ]
Aburto-Oropeza, Octavio [3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Australian Res Council, Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] Comunidad & Biodiversidad AC, Colonia Delicias, Guaymas, Mexico
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Ctr Marine Biodivers & Conservat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
systematic conservation planning; conservation priority; marine spatial planning; marine protected area network; spatial similarity; gap analysis; GREAT-BARRIER-REEF; PROTECTED AREAS; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SOCIOECONOMIC DATA; RESERVE NETWORKS; COASTAL; CONNECTIVITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.2334
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
1. Overfishing, pollution, coastal development and climate change threaten marine biodiversity globally and compromise the services that marine ecosystems provide. Systematic conservation planning (SCP) provides a framework to identify areas where actions can be effective in addressing these threats, while minimizing the costs of interventions. This study investigated the application of SCP in the Gulf of California, a marine hotspot where seven prioritization exercises have been undertaken. 2. The review of planning exercises showed that the use of SCP methods has progressed slowly (gaps include planning for land-sea connections and ecosystem services) and highlighted benefits and difficulties of applying SCP principles and tools. 3. Despite some convergence, important spatial differences were found in priorities between plans. Convergence was evident in well-studied shallow and benthic marine ecosystems. There were also important differences related to the planning approach, methods and extent. Divergence between methodological and spatial similarities between plans suggests that additional factors (e.g. manually delineating priority areas, incorporating updated datasets, random error), in addition to data and objectives, play an important role in defining the distribution of conservation priorities. 4. According to expert opinion, the implementation of new marine protected areas (MPAs) in the region has been influenced by some of the planning exercises. However, uptake of planning outputs has progressed slowly for many reasons (e.g. conflicting mandates and interests between organizations, limited technical capacities and resources, insufficient political commitment). Other benefits of planning included: developing institutional skills and knowledge; improving collaboration and coordination between organizations (including agencies, and local, regional and national NGOs); converging on the need to assess priorities for marine conservation in regional context; and building trust among organizations. 5. The existence of multiple marine conservation plans in the Gulf of California also highlighted some of the complexities and benefits of having multiple sets of priorities.>Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 505
页数:23
相关论文
共 116 条
[71]   Strategies for successful marine conservation: Integrating socioeconomic, political, and scientific factors [J].
Lundquist, CJ ;
Granek, EF .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :1771-1778
[72]   Systematic conservation planning [J].
Margules, CR ;
Pressey, RL .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6783) :243-253
[73]   Connectivity in the northern Gulf of California from particle tracking in a three-dimensional numerical model [J].
Marinone, S. G. ;
Ulloa, M. J. ;
Pares-Sierra, A. ;
Lavin, M. F. ;
Cudney-Bueno, R. .
JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS, 2008, 71 (1-2) :149-158
[74]   Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: A globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves [J].
McCook, Laurence J. ;
Ayling, Tony ;
Cappo, Mike ;
Choat, J. Howard ;
Evans, Richard D. ;
De Freitas, Debora M. ;
Heupel, Michelle ;
Hughes, Terry P. ;
Jones, Geoffrey P. ;
Mapstone, Bruce ;
Marsh, Helene ;
Mills, Morena ;
Molloy, Fergus J. ;
Pitcher, C. Roland ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Russ, Garry R. ;
Sutton, Stephen ;
Sweatman, Hugh ;
Tobin, Renae ;
Wachenfeld, David R. ;
Williamson, David H. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (43) :18278-18285
[75]   Designing marine protected area networks to address the impacts of climate change [J].
McLeod, Elizabeth ;
Salm, Rodney ;
Green, Alison ;
Almany, Jeanine .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (07) :362-370
[76]   Management Effectiveness of the World's Marine Fisheries [J].
Mora, Camilo ;
Myers, Ransom A. ;
Coll, Marta ;
Libralato, Simone ;
Pitcher, Tony J. ;
Sumaila, Rashid U. ;
Zeller, Dirk ;
Watson, Reg ;
Gaston, Kevin J. ;
Worm, Boris .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2009, 7 (06)
[77]  
Morgan L., 2005, Marine priority conservation areas
[78]   The Global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation [J].
Olson, DM ;
Dinerstein, E .
ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 2002, 89 (02) :199-224
[79]   Marine and terrestrial protected areas in Mexico: Importance of their functional connectivity in conservation management [J].
Ortiz-Lozano, L. ;
Gutierrez-Velazquez, A. L. ;
Granados-Barba, A. .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 52 (12) :620-627
[80]   Lessons for marine conservation planning: A comparison of three marine protected area planning processes [J].
Osmond, Michael ;
Airame, Satie ;
Caldwell, Margaret ;
Day, Jon .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 53 (02) :41-51