On the origin and evolution of nest building by passerine birds

被引:110
作者
Collias, NE
机构
[1] Department of Biology, University of California, Los Angeles
来源
CONDOR | 1997年 / 99卷 / 02期
关键词
evolution; nest; Passeriformes; body size; Furnariidae; Asthenes anthoides; Myiornis auricularis;
D O I
10.2307/1369932
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The object of this review is to relate nest-building behavior to the origin and early evolution of passerine birds (Order Passeriformes). I present evidence for the hypothesis that the combination of small body size and the ability to place a constructed nest where the bird chooses, helped make possible a vast amount of adaptive radiation. A great diversity of potential habitats especially accessible to small birds was created in the late Tertiary by global climatic changes and by the continuing great evolutionary expansion of flowering plants and insects. Cavity or hole nests (in ground or tree), open-cup nests (outside of holes), and domed nests (with a constructed roof) were all present very early in evolution of the Passeriformes, as indicated by the presence of all three of these basic nest types among the most primitive families of living passerine birds. Secondary specializations of these basic nest types are illustrated in the largest and most successful families of suboscine birds. Nest site and nest form and structure often help characterize the genus, as is exemplified in the suboscines by the ovenbirds (Furnariidae), a large family that builds among the most diverse nests of any family of birds. The domed nest is much more common among passerines than in nan-passerines, and it is especially frequent among the very smallest passerine birds the world over. Each basic type of nest built by passerines has advantages and disadvantages in specific ecological situations, and nest type depends on a balance of multiple factors that involve the nest site, the physical environment, the community, and the size and behavior of the birds.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 270
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]   INSECT DIVERSITY IN THE FOSSIL RECORD [J].
LABANDEIRA, CC ;
SEPKOSKI, JJ .
SCIENCE, 1993, 261 (5119) :310-315
[22]   NEST PREDATION IN INSULAR AND MAINLAND LOWLAND RAINFOREST IN PANAMA [J].
LOISELLE, BA ;
HOPPES, WG .
CONDOR, 1983, 85 (01) :93-95
[23]   The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: A review of methods and conclusions [J].
Major, RE ;
Kendal, CE .
IBIS, 1996, 138 (02) :298-307
[24]   HABITAT AND AREA EFFECTS ON FOREST BIRD ASSEMBLAGES - IS NEST PREDATION AN INFLUENCE [J].
MARTIN, TE .
ECOLOGY, 1988, 69 (01) :74-84
[25]   LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS OF OPEN-NESTING VS CAVITY-NESTING BIRDS [J].
MARTIN, TE ;
LI, PJ .
ECOLOGY, 1992, 73 (02) :579-592
[26]   ARTIFICIAL NEST EXPERIMENTS - EFFECTS OF NEST APPEARANCE AND TYPE OF PREDATOR [J].
MARTIN, TE .
CONDOR, 1987, 89 (04) :925-928
[27]   REPRODUCTIVE-CYCLE AND NESTING SUCCESS OF MOUNTAIN WHITE-CROWNED SPARROW (ZONOTRICHIA-LEUCOPHRYS-ORIANTHA) IN CENTRAL SIERRA-NEVADA [J].
MORTON, ML ;
OSBORN, JM ;
HORSTMAN.JL .
CONDOR, 1972, 74 (02) :152-+
[28]   OBSERVATIONS IN NESTING OF SPARTONOICA-MALUROIDES [J].
NAROSKY, S .
IBIS, 1973, 115 (03) :412-413
[29]   THE EVOLUTION OF NEST-SITE SELECTION AMONG HOLE-NESTING BIRDS - THE IMPORTANCE OF NEST PREDATION AND COMPETITION [J].
NILSSON, SG .
ORNIS SCANDINAVICA, 1984, 15 (03) :167-175
[30]  
Oniki Y., 1979, Revista Brasileira de Biologia, V39, P747