Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework

被引:456
作者
De Carolis, DM [1 ]
Saparito, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Coll Business, Dept Management, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00109.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Entrepreneurship-the recognition and exploitation of opportunities-is valuable within organizations as well as in the establishment of new ventures. Some studies have addressed the issue why some individuals take advantage of opportunities and some do not. While some studies find that psychological variables, personality traits and demographic factors may distinguish entrepreneurial activity, these findings are equivocal. Other research has looked to the importance of social capital and network ties to new venture creation. Yet, there is little discussion regarding the possibility that social capital and personal factors interact and influence entrepreneurial behavior. Drawing from social cognitive theory (Augoustinos & Walker, 1995; Fiske & Taylor, 1984; Bandura, 1986; Wood & Bandura, 1989) this paper advances a model suggesting that entrepreneurial behavior is a result of the interplay of environments (i.e., social networks) and certain cognitive biases in entrepreneurs. We propose that both individual cognition and social capital are important in understanding entrepreneurial behavior. If the domain of entrepreneurship is "... the nexus of two phenomena: the presence of lucrative opportunities and the presence of enterprising individuals" (Shane & Venkataraman, 2000) then our model suggests an explanation of this nexus through exploring how both external (i.e., social capital) and internal factors (i.e., cognition) affect why some people and not others exploit opportunities.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 56
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[51]   Trust as an organizing principle [J].
McEvily, B ;
Perrone, V ;
Zaheer, A .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (01) :91-103
[52]   Decision making in an organizational setting: Cognitive and organizational influences on risk assessment in commercial lending [J].
McNamara, G ;
Bromiley, P .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (05) :1063-1088
[53]   Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage [J].
Nahapiet, J ;
Ghoshal, S .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (02) :242-266
[54]   A DYNAMIC THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE CREATION [J].
NONAKA, I .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (01) :14-37
[55]   OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS [J].
OSKAMP, S .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1965, 29 (03) :261-265
[56]   USING COGNITIVE THEORY TO EXPLAIN ENTREPRENEURIAL RISK-TAKING - CHALLENGING CONVENTIONAL WISDOM [J].
PALICH, LE ;
BAGBY, DR .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 1995, 10 (06) :425-438
[57]   BEHAVIORAL DECISION RESEARCH - A CONSTRUCTIVE PROCESSING PERSPECTIVE [J].
PAYNE, JW ;
BETTMAN, JR ;
JOHNSON, EJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 43 :87-131
[58]   Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust [J].
Rousseau, DM ;
Sitkin, SB ;
Burt, RS ;
Camerer, C .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :393-404
[59]  
Rowley T, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P369, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO
[60]  
2-M