Public preferences for cultivated land protection in Wenling City, China: A choice experiment study

被引:41
作者
Jin Jianjun [1 ]
Chong, Jiang [1 ]
Truong Dang Thuy [2 ]
Lun, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Resources Sci &Technol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
Cultivated land protection; Economic valuation; Willingness to pay; Choice experiment; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; AGRICULTURAL LAND; POLICY; PRESERVATION; IMPROVEMENTS; CONSERVATION; VALUATION; BENEFITS; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study measures the public preferences for cultivated land protection as a case study of Wenling City, China, using the choice experiment (CE) approach. The estimation results indicate that the most important attribute for cultivated land protection in Wenling City was land facility, followed by land fertility and then by landscape improvement. The monthly willingness-to-pay of a typical household for the cultivated land protection from the status quo to the highest attribute level is calculated as RMB23.79 (US$3.66), and the total annual willingness-to-pay for the entire population of the study area is RMB232 million (US$35.7 million). This study allows us to provide policymakers with quantitative information related to cultivated land protection programs. The study concludes that CE is a reliable tool in the analysis of respondent preferences for the development of suitable cultivated land protection schemes in China. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 343
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[2]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[3]   Contingent valuation approach in measuring the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural areas in Japan [J].
Aizaki, Hideo ;
Sato, Kazuo ;
Osari, Hiroshi .
PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 4 (04) :217-222
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, USING SURVEYS VALUE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973, CONDITIONAL LOGIT AN
[6]   What Have We Learned from Over 20 Years of Farmland Amenity Valuation Research in North America? [J].
Bergstrom, John C. ;
Ready, Richard C. .
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (01) :21-49
[7]   A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation [J].
Boxall, PC ;
Adamowicz, WL ;
Swait, J ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (03) :243-253
[8]   Convergent Validity of Attribute-Based, Choice Questions in Stated-Preference Studies [J].
Boyle, Kevin J. ;
Ozdemir, Semra .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 42 (02) :247-264
[9]  
Bradbury I, 1996, AMBIO, V25, P204
[10]  
Cai Y. Y., 2006, ECOLOGICAL EC ACAD E, V2, P10