Femoral and Tibial Torsion Measurements With 3D Models Based on Low-Dose Biplanar Radiographs in Comparison With Standard CT Measurements

被引:78
作者
Buck, Florian M. [1 ]
Guggenberger, Roman [1 ]
Koch, Peter P. [2 ]
Pfirrmann, Christian W. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Orthoped Univ Hosp Balgrist, Dept Radiol, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Orthoped Univ Hosp Balgrist, Dept Orthoped Surg, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
CT; femoral torsion; low-dose biplanar radiography; tibial torsion; ROTATIONAL MALALIGNMENT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ANTEVERSION; OSTEOTOMY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; FRACTURES; ANTETORSION;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.11.8295
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interchangeability of femoral and tibial torsion measurements obtained with 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiographs and standard CT measurements by testing the following two hypotheses: that there is excellent agreement between the two methods and that there is excellent interreader agreement. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two independent readers used 3D models based on low-dose simultaneous biplanar radiographs and axial CT images to measure femoral and tibial torsion in 35 patients (mean age, 65 years; range, 46-89 years) with osteoarthritis of the knee who were to undergo prosthesis insertion. The two measurements were compared by means of Bland-Altman plots and descriptive statistics. Interreader agreement was quantified with intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS. The average differences between readers on the CT measurements were 1.3 degrees (range, 0 degrees-11 degrees) for the femur and 1.5 degrees (range, 0 degrees-12 degrees) for the tibia. The average differences for the measurements obtained with the 3D model were 0.1 degrees (range, 0 degrees-9 degrees) for the femur and 0.8 degrees (range, 0 degrees-10 degrees) for the tibia. The average differences between the two methods were 0 degrees (range, -5 degrees to 7 degrees) for the femoral measurements and 3 degrees (range, -12 degrees to 5 degrees) for the tibial measurements. Bland-Altman plots showed no relevant differences between the results of the two measurement modalities. Except for one measurement of femoral torsion and one measurement of tibial torsion, all results based on the 3D models were within the 95% limit of agreement (mean +/- 1.96 SD). Interreader agreement was statistically significant (p < 0.001) for all measurements with high intraclass correlation coefficients (> 0.9). CONCLUSION. Femoral and tibial torsion measurements obtained with 3D models based on biplanar radiographs are interchangeable with standard CT measurements in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
引用
收藏
页码:W607 / W612
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Distal femur rotational alignment and patellar subluxation: A CT scan in vivo assessment [J].
Abadie, P. ;
Galaud, B. ;
Michaut, M. ;
Fallet, L. ;
Boisrenoult, P. ;
Beaufils, P. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2009, 95 (04) :267-271
[2]
Femoral torsion in patients with Blount's disease A PREVIOUSLY UNRECOGNISED COMPONENT [J].
Aird, J. J. ;
Hogg, A. ;
Rollinson, P. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (10) :1388-1393
[3]
[Anonymous], J ROY STAT SOC D STA, DOI DOI 10.2307/2987937
[4]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]
Evaluation of tibial torsion - Comparison of clinical methods and computed tomography [J].
Bouchard, R ;
Meeder, PJ ;
Krug, F ;
Libicher, M .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2004, 176 (09) :1278-1284
[6]
Fast 3D reconstruction of the lower limb using a parametric model and statistical inferences and clinical measurements calculation from biplanar X-rays [J].
Chaibi, Y. ;
Cresson, T. ;
Aubert, B. ;
Hausselle, J. ;
Neyret, P. ;
Hauger, O. ;
de Guise, J. A. ;
Skalli, W. .
COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 15 (05) :457-466
[7]
Three-dimensional measurement of femoral antetorsion: comparison to a conventional radiological method [J].
Citak, Musa ;
Oszwald, Markus ;
O'Loughlin, Padhraig F. ;
Citak, Mustafa ;
Kendoff, Daniel ;
Huefner, Tobias ;
Krettek, Christian .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2010, 130 (04) :513-518
[8]
EOS system: whole-body simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral radiographs with very low radiation dose [J].
Dubousset, J. ;
Charpak, G. ;
Skalli, W. ;
Kalifa, G. ;
Lazennec, J. -Y. .
REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2007, 93 (06) :141-143
[9]
A NEW METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF TORSION OF THE FEMUR [J].
DUNLAP, K ;
SHANDS, AR ;
HOLLISTER, LC ;
GAUL, JS ;
STREIT, HA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1953, 35-A (02) :289-311
[10]
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in lower-limb deformity correction measurements [J].
Feldman, David S. ;
Henderson, Eric R. ;
Levine, Harlan B. ;
Schrank, Philip L. ;
Koval, Kenneth J. ;
Patel, Raviraj J. ;
Spencer, Daniel B. ;
Sala, Debra A. ;
Egol, Kenneth A. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2007, 27 (02) :204-208