Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: Channel interactions

被引:55
作者
Bierer, JA [1 ]
Middlebrooks, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Kresge Hearing Res Inst, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 2004年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
cochlear implants; auditory cortex; guinea pig; channel interaction;
D O I
10.1007/s10162-003-3057-7
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study examined the interactions between electrical stimuli presented through two channels of a cochlear implant. Experiments were conducted in anesthetized guinea pigs. Multiunit spike activity recorded from the auditory cortex reflected the cumulative effects of electric field interactions in the cochlea as well as any neural interactions along the ascending auditory pathway. The cochlea was stimulated electrically through a 6-electrode intracochlear array. The stimulus on each channel was a single 80-mus/phase biphasic pulse. Channel interactions were quantified as changes in the thresholds for elevation of cortical spike rates. Experimental parameters were interchannel temporal offset (0 to +/-2000 mus), interelectrode cochlear spacing (1.5 or 2.25 mm), electrode configuration (monopolar, bipolar, or tripolar), and relative polarity between channels (same or inverted). In most conditions, presentation of a subthreshold pulse on one channel reduced the threshold for a pulse on a second channel. Threshold shifts were greatest for simultaneous pulses, but appreciable threshold reductions could persist for temporal offsets up to 640 mus. Channel interactions varied strongly with electrode configuration: threshold shifts increased in magnitude in the order tripolar, bipolar, monopolar. Channel interactions were greater for closer electrode spacing. The results have implications for design of speech processors for cochlear implants.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 48
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Auditory cortical images of tones and noise bands [J].
Arenberg, JG ;
Furukawa, S ;
Middlebrooks, JC .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 1 (02) :183-194
[2]  
BATTMER RD, 1999, LARYNGOL S, V177, P69
[3]   Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: Dependence on electrode configuration [J].
Bierer, JA ;
Middlebrooks, JC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 87 (01) :478-492
[4]   A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: Pulse-train response [J].
Bruce, IC ;
Irlicht, LS ;
White, MW ;
O'Leary, SJ ;
Dynes, S ;
Javel, E ;
Clark, GM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 46 (06) :630-637
[5]   Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation [J].
Cartee, LA ;
van den Honert, C ;
Finley, CC ;
Miller, RL .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2000, 146 (1-2) :143-152
[6]   A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTS [J].
COHEN, NL ;
WALTZMAN, SB ;
FISHER, SG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (04) :233-237
[7]   PERFORMANCE OF PLANAR MULTISITE MICROPROBES IN RECORDING EXTRACELLULAR SINGLE-UNIT INTRACORTICAL ACTIVITY [J].
DRAKE, KL ;
WISE, KD ;
FARRAYE, J ;
ANDERSON, DJ ;
BEMENT, SL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1988, 35 (09) :719-732
[8]  
Dynes S. B. C., 1996, THESIS MIT
[9]   Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor [J].
Fishman, KE ;
Shannon, RV ;
Slattery, WH .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (05) :1201-1215
[10]   Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants [J].
Friesen, LM ;
Shannon, RV ;
Baskent, D ;
Wang, X .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 110 (02) :1150-1163