Validity and reliability of the Kinect within functional assessment activities: Comparison with standard stereophotogrammetry

被引:195
作者
Bonnechere, B. [1 ]
Jansen, B. [2 ,3 ]
Salvia, P. [1 ]
Bouzahouene, H. [1 ]
Omelina, L. [2 ]
Moiseev, F. [1 ]
Sholukha, V. [1 ]
Cornelis, J. [2 ]
Rooze, M. [1 ]
Jan, S. Van Sint [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Brussels, LABO, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Elect & Informat ETRO, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] iMinds, Dept Future Media & Imaging FMI, B-9050 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Motion analysis; Markerless motion capture; Biomechanics; New technology; HUMAN JOINT MOTION; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; KINEMATICS ESTIMATION; ISB RECOMMENDATION; SKIN MARKERS; MOVEMENT; SYSTEM; DEFINITIONS; CONSTRAINTS; POSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.018
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
The recent availability of the Kinect (TM) sensor, a cost- effective markerless motion capture system (MLS), offers interesting possibilities in clinical functional analysis and rehabilitation. However, neither validity nor reproducibility of this device is known yet. These two parameters were evaluated in this study. Forty-eight volunteers performed shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, hip abduction and knee flexion motions; the same protocol was repeated one week later to evaluate reproducibility. Movements were simultaneously recorded by the Kinect (with Microsoft Kinect SDK v. 1.5) MLS and a traditional markerbased stereophotogrammetry system (MBS). Considering the MBS as reference, discrepancies between MLS and MBS were evaluated by comparing the range of motion (ROM) between both systems. MLS reproducibility was found to be statistically similar to MBS results for the four exercises. Measured ROMs however were found different between the systems. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 598
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Do kinematic models reduce the effects of soft tissue artefacts in skin marker-based motion analysis? An in vivo study of knee kinematics [J].
Andersen, Michael S. ;
Benoit, Daniel L. ;
Damsgaard, Michael ;
Ramsey, Dan K. ;
Rasmussen, John .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 43 (02) :268-273
[2]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]
POSITION AND ORIENTATION IN-SPACE OF BONES DURING MOVEMENT - ANATOMICAL FRAME DEFINITION AND DETERMINATION [J].
CAPPOZZO, A ;
CATANI, F ;
DELLA CROCE, U ;
LEARDINI, A .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 10 (04) :171-178
[4]
Cheung GKM, 2003, PROC CVPR IEEE, P77
[5]
Clark RA, 2013, GAIT POSTURE
[6]
Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control [J].
Clark, Ross A. ;
Pua, Yong-Hao ;
Fortin, Karine ;
Ritchie, Callan ;
Webster, Kate E. ;
Denehy, Linda ;
Bryant, Adam L. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2012, 36 (03) :372-377
[7]
Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry - Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics [J].
Della Croce, U ;
Leardini, A ;
Chiari, L ;
Cappozzo, A .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2005, 21 (02) :226-237
[8]
Deutscher J, 2000, P IEEE CVPR, V11, P941
[9]
Influence of joint constraints on lower limb kinematics estimation from skin markers using global optimization [J].
Duprey, Sonia ;
Cheze, Laurence ;
Dumas, Raphael .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 43 (14) :2858-2862