Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach

被引:113
作者
Gerberick, GF [1 ]
Robinson, MK
Felter, SP
White, IR
Basketter, DA
机构
[1] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Labs, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] St Thomas Hosp, St Johns Inst Dermatol, London SE1 7EH, England
[3] Unilever, SEAC Toxicol Unit, Sharnbrook, Beds, England
关键词
skin; allergic contact sensitization; fragrances; exposure; potency; risk assessment; margin of safety;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450603.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Conducting a sound skin sensitization risk assessment prior to the introduction of new ingredients and products into the market place is essential. The process by which low-molecular-weight chemicals induce and elicit skin sensitization is dependent on many factors, including the ability of the chemical to penetrate the skin, react with protein, and trigger a cell-mediated immune response. Based on our chemical, cellular and molecular understanding of allergic contact dermatitis, it is possible to carry out a quantitative risk assessment. Specifically, by estimating the exposure to the allergen and its allergenic potency, it is feasible to assess quantitatively the sensitization risk of an ingredient in a particular product type. This paper focuses on applying exposure-based risk assessment tools to understanding fragrance allergy for 2 hypothetical products containing the fragrance allergen cinnamic aldehyde. The risk assessment process predicts that an eau de toilette leave-on product containing 1000 ppm or more cinnamic aldehyde would pose an unacceptable risk of induction of skin sensitization, while a shampoo, containing the same level of cinnamic aldehyde, would pose an acceptable risk of induction of skin sensitization, based on limited exposure to the ingredient from a rinse-off product application.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 340
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Andersen KE, 1995, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V75, P463
[2]  
ANDERSEN KE, 1985, CURRENT PROBLEMS DER, V14, P59
[3]  
Basketter D. A., 1998, International Journal of Cosmetic Science, V20, P141, DOI 10.1046/j.1467-2494.1998.171746.x
[4]   Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Blaikie, L ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Harvey, P ;
Evans, P ;
White, IR ;
Rycroft, RJG .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 42 (06) :344-348
[5]   Skin sensitization risk assessment: a comparative evaluation of 3 isothiazolinone biocides [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Rodford, R ;
Kimber, I ;
Smith, I ;
Wahlberg, JE .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 40 (03) :150-154
[6]   The local lymph node assay: A viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Kimber, I ;
Loveless, SE .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 34 (10) :985-997
[7]  
BASKETTER DA, 1999, COMMENTS TOXICOL, V7, P79
[8]   SKIN SENSITIZATION - A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF PREDICTIVE TEST METHODS IN ANIMALS AND MAN [J].
BOTHAM, PA ;
BASKETTER, DA ;
MAURER, T ;
MUELLER, D ;
POTOKAR, M ;
BONTINCK, WJ .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1991, 29 (04) :275-286
[9]   The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population over a 17-year period [J].
Buckley, DA ;
Wakelin, SH ;
Seed, PT ;
Holloway, D ;
Rycroft, RJG ;
White, IR ;
McFadden, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 142 (02) :279-283
[10]   INFLUENCE OF SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE ON 2,4-DINITROCHLOROBENZENE-INDUCED LYMPH-NODE ACTIVATION [J].
CUMBERBATCH, M ;
SCOTT, RC ;
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW ;
HILTON, J ;
DEARMAN, RJ ;
KIMBER, I .
TOXICOLOGY, 1993, 77 (1-2) :181-191