Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach

被引:113
作者
Gerberick, GF [1 ]
Robinson, MK
Felter, SP
White, IR
Basketter, DA
机构
[1] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Labs, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] St Thomas Hosp, St Johns Inst Dermatol, London SE1 7EH, England
[3] Unilever, SEAC Toxicol Unit, Sharnbrook, Beds, England
关键词
skin; allergic contact sensitization; fragrances; exposure; potency; risk assessment; margin of safety;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450603.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Conducting a sound skin sensitization risk assessment prior to the introduction of new ingredients and products into the market place is essential. The process by which low-molecular-weight chemicals induce and elicit skin sensitization is dependent on many factors, including the ability of the chemical to penetrate the skin, react with protein, and trigger a cell-mediated immune response. Based on our chemical, cellular and molecular understanding of allergic contact dermatitis, it is possible to carry out a quantitative risk assessment. Specifically, by estimating the exposure to the allergen and its allergenic potency, it is feasible to assess quantitatively the sensitization risk of an ingredient in a particular product type. This paper focuses on applying exposure-based risk assessment tools to understanding fragrance allergy for 2 hypothetical products containing the fragrance allergen cinnamic aldehyde. The risk assessment process predicts that an eau de toilette leave-on product containing 1000 ppm or more cinnamic aldehyde would pose an unacceptable risk of induction of skin sensitization, while a shampoo, containing the same level of cinnamic aldehyde, would pose an acceptable risk of induction of skin sensitization, based on limited exposure to the ingredient from a rinse-off product application.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 340
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[51]   THE EFFECT OF ALTERING AREA OF APPLICATION AND DOSE PER UNIT AREA ON SENSITIZATION BY DNCB [J].
WHITE, SI ;
FRIEDMANN, PS ;
MOSS, C ;
SIMPSON, JM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1986, 115 (06) :663-668