TMS over right posterior parietal cortex induces neglect in a scene-based frame of reference

被引:58
作者
Muggleton, Neil G.
Postma, Peggy
Moutsopoulou, Karolina
Nimmo-Smith, Ian
Marcel, Anthony
Walsh, Vincent
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Psychol, London, England
[3] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; spatial neglect; parietal cortex; visual search; frame of reference;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although damage to right posterior parietal cortex (RPPC) produces bias in line bisection, Karnath et al. [Karnath, H.-O., Berger, M. F., Kuker, W., & Rorden, C. (2004). The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: A study of 140 patients. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1164-1172] claim that it plays little role in spatial neglect, which is better measured by target cancellation. We used a detection task (approximating cancellation in requiring detection) to investigate this claim by compromising the parietal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Two outline shapes, one on each side of fixation, were briefly displayed before a mask. The target was a discontinuity in the left or right of the outline of one of these perceptual objects. Subjects indicated position or absence of target as fast as possible. Stimulus-mask onset asynchrony was adjusted individually to yield 75% detection. TMS was delivered over left posterior parietal cortex (LPPC), RPPC and Vertex, with Sham TMS over RPPC as a baseline control. Target detection was near ceiling and fastest at central positions and worst and slowest at the far right. Detection was significantly reduced at the far left position by TMS over RPPC. No other effects were obtained and latency was not affected by TMS. Disruption of RPPC by TMS does produce left neglect as measured by detection. Given the pattern of performance and since it was disrupted on one side of the display rather than on one side of each shape, attention and neglect were in a scene-based rather than object-based reference frame. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1222 / 1229
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
[2]   Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Ashbridge, E ;
Walsh, V ;
Cowey, A .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1997, 35 (08) :1121-1131
[3]   Visual neglect can be object-based or scene-based depending on task representation [J].
Baylis, GC ;
Baylis, LL ;
Gore, CL .
CORTEX, 2004, 40 (02) :237-246
[4]  
Bisiach Edoardo, 1995, P1331
[5]   Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Bjoertomt, O ;
Cowey, A ;
Walsh, V .
BRAIN, 2002, 125 :2012-2022
[6]   1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans [J].
Brighina, F ;
Bisiach, E ;
Oliveri, M ;
Piazza, A ;
La Bua, V ;
Daniele, O ;
Fierro, B .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2003, 336 (02) :131-133
[8]   PARALLEL PROCESSING OF MULTIELEMENT DISPLAYS [J].
EGETH, H ;
JONIDES, J ;
WALL, S .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 3 (04) :674-698
[9]  
Ellison A, 2003, SUPPL CLIN NEUROPHYS, V56, P321
[10]  
ELLISON A, 2004, BARIN ADV ACCESS