Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate

被引:67
作者
Romano, Joseph P. [1 ]
Shaikh, Azeem M.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
familywise error rate; false discovery rate; false discovery proportion; multiple testing; p-value; stepup procedure; stepdown procedure;
D O I
10.1214/009053606000000461
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Consider the multiple testing problem of testing null hypotheses H-1,..., H-S. A classical approach to dealing with the multiplicity problem is to restrict attention to procedures that control the familywise error rate (FWER), the probability of even one false rejection. But if s is large, control of the FWER is so stringent that the ability of a procedure that controls the FWER to detect false null hypotheses is limited. It is therefore desirable to consider other measures of error control. This article considers two generalizations of the FIVER. The first is the k-FWER, in which one is willing to tolerate k or more false rejections for some fixed k >= 1. The second is based on the false discovery proportion (FDP), defined to be the number of false rejections divided by the total number of rejections (and defined to be 0 if there are no rejections). Benjamini and Hochberg [J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser B 57 (1995) 289-300] proposed control of the false discovery rate (FDR), by which they meant that, for fixed alpha, E(FDP) <= alpha. Here, we consider control of the FDP in the sense that, for fixed gamma and alpha, P {FDP > gamma} <= alpha. Beginning with any nondecreasing sequence of constants and p-values for the individual tests, we derive stepup procedures that control each of these two measures of error control without imposing any assumptions on the dependence structure of the p-values. We use our results to point out a few interesting connections with some closely related stepdown procedures. We then compare and contrast two FDP-controlling procedures obtained using our results with the stepup procedure for control of the FDR of Benjamini and Yekutieli.
引用
收藏
页码:1850 / 1873
页数:24
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Testing statistical hypotheses, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-70578-7, 10.1007/978-3-030-70578-7]
[2]  
Benjamini Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
[3]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[4]  
Finner H, 1998, ANN STAT, V26, P505
[5]   A stochastic process approach to false discovery control [J].
Genovese, C ;
Wasserman, L .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2004, 32 (03) :1035-1061
[6]   A SHARPER BONFERRONI PROCEDURE FOR MULTIPLE TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE [J].
HOCHBERG, Y .
BIOMETRIKA, 1988, 75 (04) :800-802
[7]  
HOLM S, 1979, SCAND J STAT, V6, P65
[8]  
Hommel G., 1987, MULTIPLE HYPOTHESIS, P54
[9]  
Hommel G., 1983, Biometrical Journal, V25, P423, DOI [10.1002/bimj.19830250502, DOI 10.1002/BIMJ.19830250502]
[10]   Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data [J].
Korn, EL ;
Troendle, JF ;
McShane, LM ;
Simon, R .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2004, 124 (02) :379-398