Drop downs and scroll mice - The effect of response option format and input mechanism employed on data quality in Web surveys

被引:28
作者
Healey, Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Palmerston North, New Zealand
关键词
Web survey; measurement error; scroll mouse; drop-down box; radio button;
D O I
10.1177/0894439306293888
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Online researchers face whether to use radio buttons or drop downs when presenting respondents with "select one answer from many" questions. However, empirical evidence regarding response effects does not provide direction for favoring one. Using data collected in a New Zealand general population Web survey of 2,400 people, this study contributes to the decision process by investigating format response effects at multiple levels and exploring the potential for input mechanisms to interfere with drop-down answer selection. Format choice did not significantly affect survey completions, number of nonsubstantial answers, or time to completion. However, drop downs led to higher item nonresponse and longer response times. Furthermore, the 76% of respondents using scroll mice to complete the survey were prone to accidentally changing an answer if presented with drop-down questions. This increased average response times and skewed distribufion of responses to the drop-down treatment questions toward the bottom of the response list. fmplications of these findings for Web-based data collection are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 128
页数:18
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, J AM STAT ASSOC
[2]   Do different response formats change the latent structure of responses? An empirical investigation using taxometric analysis [J].
Arnau, RC ;
Thompson, RL ;
Cook, C .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 61 (01) :23-44
[3]   The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a Web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents [J].
Birnholtz, JP ;
Horn, DB ;
Finholt, TA ;
Bae, SJ .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2004, 22 (03) :355-362
[4]  
Bosnjak M, 2003, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V21, P208, DOI 10.1177/0894439303251569
[5]  
Cobanoglu C, 2003, INT J MARKET RES, V45, P475
[6]   A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or internet-based surveys [J].
Cook, C ;
Heath, F ;
Thompson, RL .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 60 (06) :821-836
[7]   Technology trends in survey data collection [J].
Couper, MP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2005, 23 (04) :486-501
[8]   Web survey design and administration [J].
Couper, MP ;
Traugott, MW ;
Lamias, MJ .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2001, 65 (02) :230-253
[9]   Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments [J].
Couper, MP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2000, 18 (04) :384-396
[10]   What they see is what we get - Response options for web surveys [J].
Couper, MP ;
Tourangeau, R ;
Conrad, FG ;
Crawford, SD .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2004, 22 (01) :111-127