Multiple attribute decision making considering aspiration-levels: A method based on prospect theory

被引:92
作者
Fan, Zhi-Ping [1 ]
Zhang, Xiao [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Fa-Dong [3 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Business Adm, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
[2] Xidian Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Dept Ind Engn, Xian 710071, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Constance, Dept Econ, D-78457 Constance, Germany
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Multiple attribute decision making (MADM); Aspiration-level; Prospect theory; Gain; Loss; Ranking; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; LOSS AVERSION; DOMINANCE; SELECTION; NUMBERS; CHOICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2013.02.013
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper, a method based on prospect theory is proposed to solve the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problem considering aspiration-levels of attributes, where attribute values and aspiration-levels are represented in two different formats: crisp numbers and interval numbers. According to the idea of prospect theory, aspiration-levels are firstly regarded as the reference points, and the four possible types for comparing an attribute value with an aspiration-level are described. Then, for all possible cases of the four types, the calculation formulae of gains and losses of alternatives concerning attributes are given. By calculating gain and loss of each alternative, a gain matrix and a loss matrix are constructed, respectively. Further, using the value function proposed in prospect theory and the simple additive weighting method, the overall prospect value of each alternative is calculated. Based on the obtained overall prospect values, a ranking of alternatives can be determined. Finally, a numerical example is used to illustrate the use of the proposed method. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 350
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]  
Hwang Ching-Lai, 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D, P58
[12]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[13]   A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments [J].
Kulak, O .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2005, 29 (02) :310-319
[14]   Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach [J].
Kulak, O ;
Kahraman, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2005, 95 (03) :415-424
[15]   Prospect theory and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) [J].
Lahdelma, Risto ;
Salminen, Pekka .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (05) :961-971
[16]   A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making [J].
Li, Deng-Feng ;
Huang, Zhi-Gang ;
Chen, Guo-Hong .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 59 (04) :561-572
[18]   Matrix games with interval data [J].
Liu, Shiang-Tai ;
Kao, Chiang .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 56 (04) :1697-1700
[19]   AN ASPIRATION-LEVEL INTERACTIVE MODEL FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING [J].
LOTFI, V ;
STEWART, TJ ;
ZIONTS, S .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1992, 19 (07) :671-681
[20]   A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights [J].
Ma, J ;
Fan, ZP ;
Huang, LH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 112 (02) :397-404