An analytical framework to discuss the usability of (environmental) indicators for policy

被引:81
作者
Bauler, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Inst Gest Environm & Amenagement Terr, Ctr Etud Dev Durable, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Indicator; Policy use; Institutionalisation; Usability; Institutional embeddedness; Reflexive governance; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS; SCIENCE; RATIONALITY; INFORMATION; BOUNDARY; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.05.013
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Evidence on the role of information and knowledge for policy making shows that policy actors seldom use information as a direct input to their decisions. Similar patterns of (non)use have been identified in the case of indicators in the environmental and sustainable development policy domains. The objective of the paper is to elucidate the patterns of environmental indicator use and to argue for the introduction of a 'politics of policy indicators'. With a limited set of characteristics (e.g. legitimacy, credibility and salience) of indicators, which help to apprehend the usability of indicators, we argue that the usability profile of indicators can be analysed as a matter of construction and deliberation by indicator creators and policy actors. The performance of indicators as policy tools - as rendered with their usability profile - is co-dependent of the institutional embeddedness of the indicators. Our conclusion makes the case that if environmental improvements towards more sustainability are partly relying on the quality and uptake of information into policy processes in order to steer decisions, then the 'usability profile' of indicators itself should be subject to collective and conscious steering. This call to 'steer the steering' is supported by the wider calls to initiate patterns of 'reflexive governance' within the sustainability policy domain. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]   Validating sustainability indicators: Focus on ecological aspects of Flemish dairy farms [J].
Meul, Marijke ;
Nevens, Frank ;
Reheul, Dirk .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2009, 9 (02) :284-295
[32]   New civic epistemologies of quantification: Making sense of indicators of local and global sustainability [J].
Miller, C .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2005, 30 (03) :403-432
[33]  
Newig J., 2008, Governance for sustainable development: steering in contexts of ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power
[34]   Characterizing and measuring sustainable development [J].
Parris, TM ;
Kates, RW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2003, 28 :559-586
[35]   Rationality and use of information in policy decisions - A search for alternatives [J].
Rich, RF ;
Oh, CH .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2000, 22 (02) :173-211
[36]   DILEMMAS IN A GENERAL THEORY OF PLANNING [J].
RITTEL, HWJ ;
WEBBER, MM .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1973, 4 (02) :155-169
[37]   Selecting biological indicators for monitoring soils: A framework for balancing scientific and technical opinion to assist policy development [J].
Ritz, Karl ;
Black, Helaina I. J. ;
Campbell, Colin D. ;
Harris, Jim A. ;
Wood, Claire .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2009, 9 (06) :1212-1221
[38]  
Rosenstrom U., 2006, Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, V5
[39]   POLITICAL-SCIENCE AND PUBLIC-POLICY [J].
SABATIER, PA .
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 1991, 24 (02) :144-147
[40]  
Scriven M.in., 1997, EVALUATION 21 CENTUR