The United States and international climate cooperation: International "pull" versus domestic "push"

被引:20
作者
Bang, Guri
Froyn, Camilla Bretteville
Hovi, Jon
Menz, Fredric C.
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Polit Sci, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
[2] Ctr Int Climate & Environm Res, Oslo, Norway
[3] Clarkson Univ, Sch Business, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
关键词
climate regime; Kyoto Protocol; international cooperation; the United States; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; US; PROTECTION; POLITICS; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The US government is being pressured by both international and domestic influences to re-engage in international climate control. This paper considers whether the international "pull" and the domestic "push" will be strong enough to accomplish this. First, we discuss whether changes in the architecture of the current climate regime might induce the United States to re-engage at the international level. We argue that the United States is unlikely to rejoin any global climate regime that is based on the Kyoto architecture, even if Kyoto were to be "reformed". Second, we discuss whether domestic political developments might eventually cause the United States to re-engage. We conclude that US re-engagement is likely to require the emergence of a new climate regime that basically extends US regulation to other countries. However, the forging of a unified US climate policy is still in the making. Furthermore, a new regime can gain widespread participation only if the Kyoto countries accept the idea of replacing Kyoto with some alternative architecture, which seems unlikely in the near future. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1282 / 1291
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MIL ANN UNESCO S SEP
[2]   Consensus treaties [J].
Barrett, S .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2002, 158 (04) :529-547
[3]   STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL-TRADE [J].
BARRETT, S .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1994, 54 (03) :325-338
[4]  
Barrett S, 2003, ENV STATECRAFT STRAT, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470024747
[5]  
Baumol W.J., 1988, The theory of environmental policy
[6]   Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals? [J].
Berk, Marcel M. ;
den Elzen, Michel G. J. .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2001, 1 (04) :465-480
[7]   Transnational networks and global environmental governance:: The Cities for Climate Protection program [J].
Betsill, MM ;
Bulkeley, H .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2004, 48 (02) :471-493
[8]  
Bodansky D, 2001, GLOBAL ENVIRON ACCOR, P23
[9]  
Bohm P., 1985, HDB NATURAL RESOURCE, P395
[10]   Oil supply and oil politics: Deja Vu all over again [J].
Cleveland, CJ ;
Kaufmann, RK .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (06) :485-489