Normal macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using stratus optical coherence tomography

被引:310
作者
Chan, A
Duker, JS
Ko, TH
Fujimoto, JG
Schuman, JS
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, New England Eye Ctr, Tufts New England Med Ctr, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] MIT, Elect Res Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Med Ctr,Eye Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archopht.124.2.193
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To report normal macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using the latest commercially available optical coherence tomography (OCT) mapping software, version 3.0, from the Stratus OCT (OCT3). Methods: Thirty-seven eyes from 37 healthy subjects underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, including OCT. Six radial scans, 6 mm in length and centered on the fovea, were obtained using the OCT3. Retinal thickness was automatically calculated by OCT mapping software. Measurements were displayed as the mean and standard deviation for each of the 9 regions defined in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Results: Foveal thickness (mean thickness in the central 1000-mu m diameter area) and central foveal thickness (mean thickness at the point of intersection of 6 radial scans) on the OCT3 were 212 +/- 20 and 182 +/- 23 mu m, respectively. Macular thickness measurements were thinnest at the center of the fovea, thickest within 3-mm diameter of the center, and diminished toward the periphery of the macula. The temporal quadrant was thinner than the nasal quadrant. Central foveal thickness was also manually determined as 170 +/- 18 mu m, approximately 12 mu m less than the value automatically obtained from the OCT3 software. There was no correlation between age and foveal thickness (P=.80). Conclusions: Mean foveal thickness measurements were 38 to 62 mu m thicker than previously reported values, while mean central foveal thickness measurements were 20 to 49 mu m thicker than previously published values. This discrepancy should be considered when interpreting OCT scans.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 198
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V98, P741
[2]  
Baumann M, 1998, OPHTHALMIC SURG LAS, V29, P280
[3]   Detection of diabetic foveal edema - Contact lens biomicroscopy compared with optical coherence tomography [J].
Brown, JC ;
Solomon, SD ;
Bressler, SB ;
Schachat, AP ;
DiBernardo, C ;
Bressler, NM .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 122 (03) :330-335
[4]   Temporal variation in diabetic macular edema measured by optical coherence tomography [J].
Frank, RN ;
Schulz, L ;
Abe, K ;
Iezzi, R .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 111 (02) :211-217
[5]   Retinal thickness in diabetic retinopathy - A study using optical coherence tomography (OCT) [J].
Goebel, W ;
Kretzchmar-Gross, T .
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2002, 22 (06) :759-767
[6]   Topography of diabetic macular edema with optical coherence tomography [J].
Hee, MR ;
Puliafito, CA ;
Duker, JS ;
Reichel, E ;
Coker, JG ;
Wilkins, JR ;
Schuman, JS ;
Swanson, EA ;
Fujimoto, JG .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (02) :360-370
[7]   OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY OF THE HUMAN RETINA [J].
HEE, MR ;
IZATT, JA ;
SWANSON, EA ;
HUANG, D ;
SCHUMAN, JS ;
LIN, CP ;
PULIAFITO, CA ;
FUJIMOTO, JG .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 113 (03) :325-332
[8]   OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY [J].
HUANG, D ;
SWANSON, EA ;
LIN, CP ;
SCHUMAN, JS ;
STINSON, WG ;
CHANG, W ;
HEE, MR ;
FLOTTE, T ;
GREGORY, K ;
PULIAFITO, CA ;
FUJIMOTO, JG .
SCIENCE, 1991, 254 (5035) :1178-1181
[9]   Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma [J].
Jaffe, GJ ;
Caprioli, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 137 (01) :156-169
[10]  
Kanai Kaname, 2002, Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, V106, P162