Rush to judgment: An empirical analysis of environmental equity in US Environmental Protection Agency enforcement actions

被引:33
作者
Atlas, M [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3185398
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In 1992, the National Law journal (NLJ) published a study claiming that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency discriminated against minorities in its civil judicial enforcement actions by penalizing environmental law violators in minority areas far less than in white areas. NLJ claimed that this differential showed a lack of commitment to protecting the environment and public health in minority areas. This article augments, reexamines, and analyzes in a more sophisticated manner the available data. My empirical analyses demonstrate the unreliability of NLJ's methods and conclusions and indicate that minorities have not been discriminated against in these enforcement actions.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 682
页数:50
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]  
JACOBS L, 1983, CASE MANAGEMENT PROC
[22]  
KLEIN SP, 1991, JURIMETRICS, V32, P33
[23]  
KRITZER H, 1993, LETS MAKE DEAL UNDER
[24]  
Kuehn Robert R., 1994, ST. JOHN'S J. LEGAL COMMENT, V9, P625
[25]  
LAVELLE M, 1992, NATL LAW J, pS1
[26]  
LAZARUS RJ, 1993, NORTHWEST U LAW REV, V87, P787
[27]  
MANK BC, 1995, OHIO ST LJ, V56, P329
[28]  
Mintz Joel A., 1995, ENFORCEMENT EPA HIGH
[29]  
Mohai P., 1995, Va Envtl LJ, P615