Estimating mean sojourn time and screening test sensitivity in breast cancer mammography screening:: new results

被引:33
作者
Weedon-Fekjær, H
Vatten, LJ
Aalen, OO
Lindqvist, B
Tretli, S
机构
[1] Canc Registry Norway, Dept Aetiol Canc Res, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Biostat Sect, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Community Med & Gen Practice, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1258/096914105775220732
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess if new screening techniques, increased use of hormone replacement therapy, or the transition from breast cancer screening trials to large scale screening programmes may influence the average time in preclinical screening detectable phase (mean sojourn time [MST]) or screening test sensitivity (STS). Setting: Screening and interval data for 395,188 women participating in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme (NBCSP). Methods: Weighted non-linear least-square regression estimates using a tree step Markov chain model, and a sensitivity analysis of the possible impact by opportunistic screening between ordinary breast cancer screening rounds. Results: MST was estimated to 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1-7.0) years for women aged 50-59 years, and 7.9 (95% CI 6.0-7.9) years for those aged 60-69 years. Correspondingly, STS was estimated to 58% (95% CI 52-64%) and 73% (67-78%), respectively. Simulations revealed that opportunistic screening may give a moderate estimation bias towards higher MST and lower STS. Assuming a probable 21% higher background incidence, due to increased hormone replacement therapy use, MST estimates decreased to 3.9 and 5.0 years for the two age groups, and STS increased to 75 and 85%. Conclusions: The new estimates indicate that screening detectable phase is longer than that found in. previous mammography trials/programmes, but also that the sensitivity of the screening test is lower. Overall, the NBCSP defects more cancer cases than most previous trials/programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 178
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening
[2]   Hormone replacement therapy and incidence of hormone-dependent cancers in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study [J].
Bakken, L ;
Alsaker, E ;
Eggen, AE ;
Lund, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 112 (01) :130-134
[3]  
Boer R, 1999, CANCER, V86, P1506, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991015)86:8<1506::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-2
[5]  
*CAN REG NORW, 2000, CANC NORW
[6]   SIMPLIFIED MODELS OF SCREENING FOR CHRONIC DISEASE - ESTIMATION PROCEDURES FROM MASS-SCREENING PROGRAMS [J].
DAY, NE ;
WALTER, SD .
BIOMETRICS, 1984, 40 (01) :1-14
[7]   ESTIMATION OF MEAN SOJOURN TIME IN BREAST-CANCER SCREENING USING A MARKOV-CHAIN MODEL OF BOTH ENTRY TO AND EXIT FROM THE PRECLINICAL DETECTABLE PHASE [J].
DUFFY, SW ;
CHEN, HH ;
TABAR, L ;
DAY, NE .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (14) :1531-1543
[8]  
Duffy SW, 2001, QUANTITATIVE METHODS, P42
[9]   THE MISCAN SIMULATION PROGRAM FOR THE EVALUATION OF SCREENING FOR DISEASE [J].
HABBEMA, JDF ;
VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ ;
LUBBE, JTN ;
van der Maas, PJ .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1985, 20 (01) :79-93
[10]   Historical Technical Developments in Mammography [J].
Haus, Arthur G. .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2002, 1 (02) :119-126