Estimating mean sojourn time and screening test sensitivity in breast cancer mammography screening:: new results

被引:33
作者
Weedon-Fekjær, H
Vatten, LJ
Aalen, OO
Lindqvist, B
Tretli, S
机构
[1] Canc Registry Norway, Dept Aetiol Canc Res, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Biostat Sect, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Community Med & Gen Practice, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1258/096914105775220732
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess if new screening techniques, increased use of hormone replacement therapy, or the transition from breast cancer screening trials to large scale screening programmes may influence the average time in preclinical screening detectable phase (mean sojourn time [MST]) or screening test sensitivity (STS). Setting: Screening and interval data for 395,188 women participating in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme (NBCSP). Methods: Weighted non-linear least-square regression estimates using a tree step Markov chain model, and a sensitivity analysis of the possible impact by opportunistic screening between ordinary breast cancer screening rounds. Results: MST was estimated to 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1-7.0) years for women aged 50-59 years, and 7.9 (95% CI 6.0-7.9) years for those aged 60-69 years. Correspondingly, STS was estimated to 58% (95% CI 52-64%) and 73% (67-78%), respectively. Simulations revealed that opportunistic screening may give a moderate estimation bias towards higher MST and lower STS. Assuming a probable 21% higher background incidence, due to increased hormone replacement therapy use, MST estimates decreased to 3.9 and 5.0 years for the two age groups, and STS increased to 75 and 85%. Conclusions: The new estimates indicate that screening detectable phase is longer than that found in. previous mammography trials/programmes, but also that the sensitivity of the screening test is lower. Overall, the NBCSP defects more cancer cases than most previous trials/programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 178
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Do the results of the process indicators in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program predict future mortality reduction from breast cancer? [J].
Hofvind, S ;
Wang, H ;
Thoresen, S .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2004, 43 (05) :467-473
[12]   Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening [J].
Kavanagh, AM ;
Mitchell, H ;
Giles, GG .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9200) :270-274
[13]   The effect of hormone replacement therapy on the sensitivity of screening mammograms [J].
Litherland, JC ;
Stallard, S ;
Hole, D ;
Cordiner, C .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 54 (05) :285-288
[14]   Reporting of performance indicators of mammography screening in Europe [J].
Lynge, E ;
Olsen, AH ;
Fracheboud, J ;
Patnick, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2003, 12 (03) :213-222
[15]   The influence of mammographic screening on national trends in breast cancer incidence [J].
Moller, B ;
Weedon-Fekjær, H ;
Hakulinen, T ;
Tryggvadóttir, L ;
Storm, HH ;
Talbäck, M ;
Haldorsen, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (02) :117-128
[16]   MODELING THE ANALYSIS OF BREAST-CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMS - SENSITIVITY, LEAD TIME AND PREDICTIVE VALUE IN THE FLORENCE DISTRICT PROGRAM (1975-1986) [J].
PACI, E ;
DUFFY, SW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 20 (04) :852-858
[17]   Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers [J].
Porter, PL ;
El-Bastawissi, AY ;
Mandelson, MT ;
Lin, MG ;
Khalid, N ;
Watney, EA ;
Cousens, L ;
White, D ;
Taplin, S ;
White, E .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (23) :2020-2028
[18]  
Prevost TC, 1998, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V148, P609
[19]  
Spratt JS, 1996, J SURG ONCOL, V61, P68, DOI 10.1002/1096-9098(199601)61:1<68::AID-JSO2930610102>3.0.CO
[20]  
2-E