Differential response dynamics of corticothalamic glutamatergic synapses in the lateral geniculate nucleus and thalamic reticular nucleus

被引:22
作者
Alexander, GM
Fisher, TL
Godwin, DW
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Neurobiol & Anat, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Program Neurosci, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
EPSC; AMPA; GluR; thalamus; paired pulse facilitation; desensitization;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.11.012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The corticothalamic feedback pathway provides excitatory synaptic input to both the thalamic reticular nucleus and the lateral geniculate nucleus. We studied excitatory postsynaptic currents elicited from corticothalamic stimulation in the visual sector of the thalamic reticular nucleus and the lateral geniculate nucleus to compare the response of these neurons to stimulation of their common input pathway. Using whole cell patch clamp recordings in ferret thalamic slices, we compared single excitatory postsynaptic current decay kinetics, presynaptic glutamate release dynamics through paired pulse facilitation and responses to corticothalamic train stimulation. We found that single thalamic reticular nucleus excitatory postsynaptic currents were significantly sharper than lateral geniculate nucleus responses. The mean thalamic reticular nucleus excitatory postsynaptic current decay constant (tau) was 4.9 +/- 0.5 ms, while the mean lateral geniculate nucleus excitatory postsynaptic current T value was 11.8 +/- 0.8 ms. Presynaptic release dynamics as measured by responses to paired stimuli were conserved between the thalamic reticular nucleus and lateral geniculate nucleus. However, facilitating responses to train stimulation were markedly different between nuclei. Lateral geniculate nucleus responses showed proportionately larger facilitation (reaching 842.9 +/- 76.4% of excitatory postsynaptic current I amplitude) than thalamic reticular nucleus responses (reaching 223.1 +/- 44.0% of excitatory postsynaptic current I amplitude). These data indicate that while the corticothalamic pathway produces excitatory postsynaptic currents in both the thalamic reticular nucleus and lateral geniculate nucleus, other factors uniquely affect the functional integration of the inputs in each nucleus. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IBRO.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 372
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Synaptic computation [J].
Abbott, LF ;
Regehr, WG .
NATURE, 2004, 431 (7010) :796-803
[2]   Presynaptic inhibition of corticothalamic feedback by metabotropic glutamate receptors [J].
Alexander, GM ;
Godwin, DW .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 94 (01) :163-175
[3]   Expression of transcripts encoding AMPA receptor subunits and associated postsynaptic proteins in the macaque brain [J].
Beneyto, M ;
Meador-Woodruff, JH .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2004, 468 (04) :530-554
[4]  
Destexhe A, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P169
[5]  
Dingledine R, 1999, PHARMACOL REV, V51, P7
[6]   Relative numbers of cortical and brainstem inputs to the lateral geniculate nucleus [J].
Erisir, A ;
VanHorn, SC ;
Sherman, SM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (04) :1517-1520
[7]   Organization of reciprocal connections between the perigeniculate nucleus and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat: A transneuronal transport study [J].
Fitzgibbon, T .
VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 19 (04) :511-520
[8]   Differences in quantal amplitude reflect GluR4-subunit number at corticothalamic synapses on two populations of thalamic neurons [J].
Golshani, P ;
Liu, XB ;
Jones, EG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (07) :4172-4177
[9]   Dynamic properties of corticogeniculate excitatory transmission in the rat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in vitro [J].
Granseth, B .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2004, 556 (01) :135-146
[10]   Paired pulse facilitation of corticogeniculate EPSCs in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the rat investigated in vitro [J].
Granseth, B ;
Ahlstrand, E ;
Lindström, S .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2002, 544 (02) :477-486