Modification of ecological footprint evaluation method to include non-renewable resource consumption using thermodynamic approach

被引:59
作者
Nguyen, Hong X. [1 ]
Yamamoto, Ryoichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Yamamoto Lab Fe 207, Inst Ind Sci, Meguro Ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
ecological footprint; non-renewable resources; exergy; resource depletion;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study is to modify the ecological footprint methodology by incorporating non-renewable or abiotic resources as an additional category. The use of abiotic resources can be quantified as global hectare by using thermodynamic approaches. A detailed case study on various countries including Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Japan, USA, and Vietnam shows the advantage of using the new modified ecological footprint (EF) as an indicator for sustainable development. The modified EF includes not only biotic resources, but also the abiotic resources. The case study indicates that the modified EF differs from the traditional EF up to 123% in the case of Belgium, and 90% in the case of Australia. For developing countries such as Brazil and Vietnam, the differences are relatively smaller (21% for Brazil and 9.4% for Vietnam). The estimated total ecological footprint of the world using the new method implies more serious problems associated with over consumption than using results from the original ecological footprint method. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 884
页数:15
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] AYRES AU, 1999, ACCOUNTING RESOURCES, V2, P42
  • [2] BALWIN K, 2006, WORLD 7 YEARS KEY CL
  • [3] CHAMBERS N, 2000, HARING NATURES INTER
  • [4] CHAPMAN PF, 1983, METAL RESOURCES ENER, P107
  • [5] Exergies of natural resources in life-cycle assessment and other applications
    Finnveden, G
    Ostlund, P
    [J]. ENERGY, 1997, 22 (09) : 923 - 931
  • [6] Goedkoop M., 2000, ECOINDICATOR 99 METH
  • [7] GUINEE JB, 2002, ECOEFFICIENCY IND SC, V7, P675
  • [8] HALADA K, 2005, TOK TRIPL WORKSH MFA
  • [9] Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services
    Hau, JL
    Bakshi, BR
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (13) : 3768 - 3777
  • [10] Hermann WA, 2006, ENERGY, V31, P1685, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2005.09.006