Effects of size and fragmentation of marine reserves and fisher infringement on the catch and biomass of coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus, on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia

被引:40
作者
Little, LR
Smith, ADM
McDonald, AD
Punt, AE
Mapstone, BD
Pantus, F
Davies, CR
机构
[1] CSIRO Marine Res, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Tasmania, CRC Antarctic Climate & Ecosyst, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[4] James Cook Univ N Queensland, CRC Reef Res, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[5] CSIRO Marine Res, Cleveland, Qld, Australia
[6] Natl Oceans Off, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
fisher behaviour; fisheries management; marine protected areas; meta-population model; Plectropomus leopardus;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2400.2005.00440.x
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
A spatially structured simulation model of the population dynamics and line fishing exploitation of common coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus Lacepede, was used to evaluate the effects of infringement and different amounts and arrangements of marine reserves on the Reef Line Fishery of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. With no marine reserves and under a constant future effort level equal to that for 1996, the size of the population was reduced and the biomass stabilised at about 40% of pre-exploitation levels. Marine reserves were ineffective at conserving biomass when limited infringement was allowed throughout an entire reserve. When infringement was absent altogether or limited to the edges of reserves, larger marine reserves lead to lower total catches and higher overall biomass. When infringement was limited to reserve edges, a single large closure was more effective at conserving biomass than more fragmented arrangements. Simulations suggested that marine reserves might lead to better conservation of a fishery-targeted species if infringement is negligible or limited to reserve margins. Even where infringement occurred only at the edges of reserves, a network of small reserves may be less effective at conserving a targeted species than a smaller number of larger reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 188
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Theoretical ecology: principles and applications
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 52 CRC REEF RES CTR
[3]   Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution [J].
Boersma, PD ;
Parrish, JK .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 31 (02) :287-304
[4]   Evaluating large-scale experimental designs for management of coral trout on the Great Barrier [J].
Campbell, RA ;
Mapstone, BD ;
Smith, ADM .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2001, 11 (06) :1763-1777
[5]   Effects of marine reserve characteristics on the protection of fish populations:: a meta-analysis [J].
Côté, IM ;
Mosqueira, I ;
Reynolds, JD .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2001, 59 :178-189
[6]   Connectivity of marine populations: Open or closed? [J].
Cowen, RK ;
Lwiza, KMM ;
Sponaugle, S ;
Paris, CB ;
Olson, DB .
SCIENCE, 2000, 287 (5454) :857-859
[7]  
Crowder LB, 2000, B MAR SCI, V66, P799
[8]  
DAVIES CR, 1995, THESIS J COOK U
[9]   Zoning - lessons from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park [J].
Day, JC .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 45 (2-3) :139-156
[10]  
Dreyfus-León MJ, 1999, ECOL MODEL, V120, P287