Anaerobic oxidation of methane above gas hydrates at Hydrate Ridge, NE Pacific Ocean

被引:272
作者
Treude, T
Boetius, A
Knittel, K
Wallmann, K
Jorgensen, BB
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Marine Microbiol, Dept Biogeochem, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[2] Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res, Dept Geochem, D-27515 Bremerhaven, Germany
[3] Int Jacobs Univ Bremen, D-28759 Bremen, Germany
[4] GEOMAR, Res Ctr Marine Geosci, D-24148 Kiel, Germany
关键词
anaerobic oxidation of methane; methanotrophic archaea; sulfate reduction; gas hydrate; fluid flow; chemoautotrophy; cold seep; modeling;
D O I
10.3354/meps264001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
At Hydrate Ridge (HR), Cascadia convergent margin, surface sediments contain massive gas hydrates formed from methane that ascends together with fluids along faults from deeper reservoirs. Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), mediated by a microbial consortium of archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria, generates high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide in the surface sediments. The production of sulfide supports chemosynthetic communities that gain energy from sulfide oxidation. Depending on fluid flow, the surface communities are dominated either by the filamentous sulfur bacteria Beggiatoa (high advective flow), the clam Calyptogena (low advective flow), or the bivalve Acharax (diffusive flow). We analyzed surface sediments (0 to 10 cm) populated by chemosynthetic communities for AOM, sulfate reduction (SR) and the distribution of the microbial consortium mediating AOM. Highest AOM rates were found at the Beggiatoa field with an average rate of 99 mmol m(-2) d(-1) integrated over 0 to 10 cm. These rates are among the highest AOM rates ever observed in methane-bearing marine sediments. At the Calyptogena field, AOM rates were lower (56 mmol m(-2) d(-1)). At the Acharax field, methane oxidation was extremely low (2.1 mmol m(-2) d(-1)) and was probably due to aerobic oxidation of methane. SR was fueled largely by methane at flow-impacted sites, but exceeded AOM in some cases, most likely due to sediment heterogeneity. At the Acharax field, SR was decoupled from methane oxidation and showed low activity. Aggregates of the AOM consortium were abundant at the fluid-impacted sites (between 5.1 x 10(12) and 7.9 x 10(12) aggregates m(-2)) but showed low numbers at the Acharax field (0.4 x 10(12) aggregates m(-2)). A transportreaction model was applied to estimate AOM at Beggiatoa fields. The model agreed with the measured depth-integrated AOM rates and the vertical distribution. AOM represents an important methane sink in the surface sediments of HR, consuming between 50 and 100 % of the methane transported by advection.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P OCEAN DRILLING P 1
[2]  
Berner RA., 1980, Early diagenesis: A theoretical approach
[3]   A marine microbial consortium apparently mediating anaerobic oxidation of methane [J].
Boetius, A ;
Ravenschlag, K ;
Schubert, CJ ;
Rickert, D ;
Widdel, F ;
Gieseke, A ;
Amann, R ;
Jorgensen, BB ;
Witte, U ;
Pfannkuche, O .
NATURE, 2000, 407 (6804) :623-626
[4]   Bacterial activity in sediments of the deep Arabian Sea in relation to vertical flux [J].
Boetius, A ;
Ferdelman, T ;
Lochte, K .
DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART II-TOPICAL STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2000, 47 (14) :2835-2875
[5]   Effect of organic enrichments on hydrolytic potentials and growth of bacteria in deep-sea sediments [J].
Boetius, A ;
Lochte, K .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1996, 140 (1-3) :239-250
[6]  
Bohrmann G, 1998, GEOLOGY, V26, P647, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0647:ACFTCS>2.3.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Boudreau B., 1997, DIAGENETIC MODELS TH, DOI [10.1016/s0264-8172(98)80005-6, DOI 10.1017/S0016756897217656]
[9]   A method-of-lines code for carbon and nutrient diagenesis in aquatic sediments [J].
Boudreau, BP .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 1996, 22 (05) :479-496
[10]   Characterization of specific membrane fatty acids as chemotaxonomic markers for sulfate-reducing bacteria involved in anaerobic oxidation of methane [J].
Elvert, M ;
Boetius, A ;
Knittel, K ;
Jorgensen, BB .
GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2003, 20 (04) :403-419