Biocompatibility of implantable synthetic polymeric drug carriers: focus on brain biocompatibility

被引:265
作者
Fournier, E [1 ]
Passirani, C [1 ]
Montero-Menei, CN [1 ]
Benoit, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] INSERM, ERIT M Ingn Vectorisat Particulaire 0104, F-49100 Angers, France
关键词
biocompatibility; inflammatory response; immune response; drug delivery; synthetic polymer; brain;
D O I
10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00161-3
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Numerous polymeric biomaterials are implanted each year in human bodies. Among them, drug delivery devices are potent novel powerful therapeutics for diseases which lack efficient treatments. Controlled release systems Lire in direct and sustained contact with the tissues, and some of them degrade in situ. Thus, both the material itself and its degradation products must be devoid of toxicity. The knowledge and understanding of the criteria and mechanisms determining the biocompatibility of biomaterials are therefore of great importance. The classical tissue response to a foreign material leads to the encapsulation of the implant, which may impair the drug, diffusion in the surrounding tissue and/or cause implant failure. This tissue response depends on different factors, especially on the implantation site. Indeed, several organs possess a particular immunological status, which may reduce the inflammatory and immune reactions. Among them, the central nervous system is of particular interest, since many pathologies still need curative treatments. This review describes the classical foreign body reaction and exposes the particularities of the central nervous system response. The recent in vivo biocompatibility studies of implanted synthetic polymeric drug carriers are summarized in order to illustrate the behavior of different classes of polymers and the methodologies used to evaluate their tolerance. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3311 / 3331
页数:21
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]   Calcitonin release system in the treatment of experimental osteoporosis. Histomorphometric evaluation [J].
Aldini, NN ;
Caliceti, P ;
Lora, S ;
Fini, M ;
Giavaresi, G ;
Rocca, M ;
Torricelli, P ;
Giardino, R ;
Veronese, FM .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2001, 19 (05) :955-961
[2]   Peripheral nerve reconstruction with bioabsorbable polyphosphazene conduits [J].
Aldini, NN ;
Fini, M ;
Rocca, M ;
Martini, L ;
Giardino, R ;
Caliceti, P ;
Veronese, FM ;
Lora, S ;
Maltarello, MC .
JOURNAL OF BIOACTIVE AND COMPATIBLE POLYMERS, 1997, 12 (01) :3-13
[3]   Regulation of T-cell responses by CNS antigen-presenting cells: different roles for microglia and astrocytes [J].
Aloisi, F ;
Ria, F ;
Adorini, L .
IMMUNOLOGY TODAY, 2000, 21 (03) :141-147
[4]   Issues and perspectives on the biocompatibility and immunotoxicity evaluation of implanted controlled release systems [J].
Anderson, JM ;
Langone, JJ .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 1999, 57 (02) :107-113
[5]   Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres [J].
Anderson, JM ;
Shive, MS .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 1997, 28 (01) :5-24
[6]   Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility and clinical applications of polylactic acid polyglycolic acid copolymers [J].
Athanasiou, KA ;
Niederauer, GG ;
Agrawal, CM .
BIOMATERIALS, 1996, 17 (02) :93-102
[7]   Host response to tissue engineered devices [J].
Babensee, JE ;
Anderson, JM ;
McIntire, LV ;
Mikos, AG .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 1998, 33 (1-2) :111-139
[8]   Viability of HEMA-MMA microencapsulated model hepatoma cells in rats and the host response [J].
Babensee, JE ;
Sefton, MV .
TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2000, 6 (02) :165-182
[9]   Immunoblot analysis of proteins associated with HEMA-MMA microcapsules: Human serum proteins in vitro and rat proteins following implantation [J].
Babensee, JE ;
Cornelius, RM ;
Brash, JL ;
Sefton, MV .
BIOMATERIALS, 1998, 19 (7-9) :839-849
[10]  
BABENSEE JE, 1997, CONTROLLED DRUG DELI, P311