Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy:: Experience on 84 patients

被引:75
作者
Caglar, Y. S.
Bozkurt, M.
Kahilogullari, G.
Tuna, H.
Bakir, A.
Torun, F.
Ugur, H. C.
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Nevki Mil Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
cervical radiculopathy; disc herniation; keyhole; anatomy;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-970138
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Anterior cervical discectomy with or without fusion has been commonly used for cervical disc disease since the description by Smith and Robinson in 1958. In this report, surgical technique, advantages, and disadvantages of the posterior approach, known as the posterior keyhole laminotomy-foraminotomy, are reviewed and motion versus fusion surgery discussed. Between 1996 and 2004, the keyhole laminotomy-foraminotomy was performed on 84 patients suffering from lateral cervical soft disc herniation or osteophytes. All the procedures were performed under the surgical microscope. A high-speed drill was used for drilling the bone. In 49 patients (58%), soft disc herniation was removed, while in 35 patients (42%) there were osteophytes. Successful relief of radiculopathy symptoms was achieved in 80 patients (96%). In 4 patients the symptoms recurred. One patient (1.2%) developed kyphosis. The only complication observed intraoperatively was a partial root injury in one patient (1.2%). Mean hospitalization time was 48 hours. The posterior approach is particularly appropriate in patients whose root compression is located postero laterally. Advantages of this surgery are minimal lamina resection, good visualization of the nerve root, postoperative early mobilization and minimal hospitalization. Microsurgery enables us to both preserve the motion of operated segment and avoid cervical instability.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 11
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
POSTEROLATERAL MICRODISCECTOMY FOR CERVICAL MONORADICULOPATHY CAUSED BY POSTEROLATERAL SOFT CERVICAL DISK SEQUESTRATION [J].
ALDRICH, F .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1990, 72 (03) :370-377
[2]
Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: Posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion [J].
Chen, BH ;
Natarajan, RN ;
An, HS ;
Andersson, GBJ .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2001, 14 (01) :17-20
[3]
The projection of the cervical disc and uncinate process on the posterior aspect of the cervical spine [J].
Ebraheim, NA ;
Xu, RM ;
Bhatti, RA ;
Yeasting, RA .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1999, 51 (04) :363-367
[4]
EPSTEIN J A, 1965, Clin Orthop Relat Res, V40, P113
[5]
A review of laminoforaminotomy for the management of lateral and foraminal cervical disc herniations or spurs [J].
Epstein, NE ;
Neblett, CR ;
Fager, CA .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2002, 57 (04) :226-234
[6]
POSTEROLATERAL APPROACH TO RUPTURED MEDIAN AND PARAMEDIAN CERVICAL DISK [J].
FAGER, CA .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1983, 20 (06) :443-452
[7]
Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy: An initial clinical experience [J].
Fessler, RG ;
Khoo, LT .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (05) :S37-S45
[8]
POSTERIOR-LATERAL FORAMINOTOMY AS AN EXCLUSIVE OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE FOR CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY - A REVIEW OF 846 CONSECUTIVELY OPERATED CASES [J].
HENDERSON, CM ;
HENNESSY, RG ;
SHUEY, HM ;
SHACKELFORD, EG .
NEUROSURGERY, 1983, 13 (05) :504-512
[9]
Gambling with your life: The process of breast cancer treatment decision making in chinese women [J].
Lam, WW ;
Fielding, R ;
Chan, M ;
Cho, L ;
Or, A .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 14 (01) :1-15
[10]
MCCULLOCH JA, 1998, ESSENTIALS SPINAL MI, P187