Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists

被引:100
作者
Cai, DA [1 ]
Fink, EL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Commun, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
culture; conflict styles; communication; individualism; collectivism;
D O I
10.1080/03637750216536
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study investigated the fundamental beliefs regarding cross-cultural differences in conflict styles. The sample consisted of 188 graduate students from 31 different countries residing in the U.S. Findings indicated that assumptions regarding the relationship of culture to conflict style preferences may not be valid. Preference for using five conflict styles were measured: avoiding, obliging, integrating, compromising, and dominating. The integrating style is generally the most preferred; obliging and avoiding are next, followed by compromising and dominating. Avoiding is preferred by individualists rather than by collectivists. Individualists do not differ from collectivists in their preference for the dominating conflict style. We also found that collectivists prefer compromising and integrating more than individualists do, whereas individualism-collectivism had no significant linear effect on preference for the obliging style. Conflict styles are highly multidimensional for both individualists and collectivists. Even though the five conflict styles can be subsumed under four types, the items measuring the five styles cannot be generated from any two-dimensional typology. Finally, the meaning of four of the five styles is different for individualists and collectivists: Dominating is the only style interpreted similarly by both groups. Areas for future research are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 87
页数:21
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]   SUPPORT FOR A 2-DIMENSIONAL MODEL OF CONFLICT BEHAVIOR [J].
RUBLE, TL ;
THOMAS, KW .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1976, 16 (01) :143-155
[32]  
SEROTA KB, 1977, COMMUNICATION YB, V1, P475
[33]   CULTURE, SELF, AND COLLECTIVIST COMMUNICATION - LINKING CULTURE TO INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR [J].
SINGELIS, TM ;
BROWN, WJ .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1995, 21 (03) :354-389
[34]   A test of the motivations underlying choice of conflict strategies in the dual-concern model [J].
Sorenson, RL ;
Morse, EA ;
Savage, GT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 1999, 10 (01) :25-44
[35]   RESOLVING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICTS - AN ANALYSIS OF STYLISTIC CONSISTENCY [J].
STERNBERG, RJ ;
DOBSON, DM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 52 (04) :794-812
[36]   STYLES OF CONFLICT-RESOLUTION [J].
STERNBERG, RJ ;
SORIANO, LJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 47 (01) :115-126
[37]  
Straus M. A., 1983, J COMP FAM STUD, V13, P377
[38]  
Tang S.F., 1986, Management Education Development, V17, P287, DOI DOI 10.1177/135050768601700315
[39]  
Thomas K., 1976, Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, P889, DOI DOI 10.1080/10781910802457485
[40]   Ethnic/cultural identity salience and conflict styles in four US ethnic groups [J].
Ting-Toomey, S ;
Yee-Jung, KK ;
Shapiro, RB ;
Garcia, W ;
Wright, TJ ;
Oetzel, JG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 2000, 24 (01) :47-81