Anti-DNA antibodies: a diagnostic and prognostic tool for systemic lupus erythematosus?

被引:84
作者
Riboldi, P
Gerosa, M
Moroni, G
Radice, A
Allegri, F
Sinico, A
Tincani, A
Meroni, PL
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Internal Med, IRCCS,Ist Auxol, Allergy Clin Immunol & Rheumatol Unit, Milan, Italy
[2] Osped Maggiore, Div Nephrol & Dialysis, Milan, Italy
[3] Osped San Carlo Borromeo Milano, Div Nephrol, Milan, Italy
[4] Spedali Civil Brescia, Serv Immunol Clin & Reumatol, I-25125 Brescia, Italy
关键词
DNA; autoantibodies; systemic lupus erythematosus; disease activity;
D O I
10.1080/08916930400022616
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The clinical impact of anti-DNA antibodies lies on their diagnostic power for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), being a formal classification criterion. In spite of such a disease association, low-avidity anti-DNA antibodies might also be part of the natural autoantibody repertoire. Their switch to pathogenic high-avidity autoantibodies is the result of the autoimmune process leading to SLE. Anti-DNA antibodies were shown to play a role in SLE pathogenesis and particularly in kidney damage. Accordingly, antibody titres might fluctuate in relation to disease activity, but their prognostic value for flares is still debated. Several methods for anti-DNA detection were described and there is evidence that the assays identify different antibodies with different prognostic value. The results of a multicenter study on four different routine tests for anti-dsDNA antibody detection showed that: (i) Farr assay displays the best diagnostic specificity/sensitivity for SLE, followed by Crithidia luciliae method (CLIFT), (ii) the new generation of solid phase assay (EliA) shows an increased sensibility versus the classical enzyme linked immune assay (ELISA) but a decreased specificity. Antibody titre detected by EliA and Farr assay correlated with disease activity. These findings would suggest that more than one assay should be useful for SLE diagnosis and monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 45
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
LEBLANC BAEW, 1994, J RHEUMATOL, V21, P2239
[22]  
MADAIO MP, 1987, J IMMUNOL, V138, P2883
[23]   Cellular penetration and nuclear localization of anti-DNA antibodies: Mechanisms, consequences, implications and applications [J].
Madaio, MP ;
Yanase, K .
JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY, 1998, 11 (05) :535-538
[24]  
Manson JJ, 2003, NETH J MED, V61, P343
[25]   Anti-C1q antibodies may help in diagnosing a renal flare in lupus nephritis [J].
Moroni, G ;
Trendelenburg, M ;
Del Papa, N ;
Quaglini, S ;
Raschi, E ;
Panzeri, P ;
Testoni, C ;
Tincani, A ;
Banfi, G ;
Balestrieri, G ;
Schifferli, JA ;
Meroni, PL ;
Ponticelli, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2001, 37 (03) :490-498
[26]  
PEEVA E, 2004, SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTH, P283
[27]   DEFINITION, INCIDENCE, AND CLINICAL DESCRIPTION OF FLARE IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS - A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY [J].
PETRI, M ;
GENOVESE, M ;
ENGLE, E ;
HOCHBERG, M .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1991, 34 (08) :937-944
[28]   Penetrating anti-DNA monoclonal antibodies induce activation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells [J].
Portales-Perez, D ;
Alarcon-Segovia, D ;
Llorente, L ;
Ruiz-Arguelles, A ;
Abud-Mendoza, C ;
Baranda, L ;
de la Fuente, H ;
Ternynck, T ;
Gonzalez-Amaro, R .
JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY, 1998, 11 (05) :563-571
[29]  
PRESTIGIACOMO T, 2004, ANIMAL MODELS HUMAN, P463
[30]   New approaches to the renal pathogenicity of anti-DNA antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus [J].
Putterman, C .
AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2004, 3 (02) :97-101