Refining emergency severity index triage criteria

被引:51
作者
Tanabe, P
Travers, D
Gilboy, N
Rosenau, A
Sierzega, G
Rupp, V
Martinovich, Z
Adams, JG
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Inst Hlth Serv Res & Policy Studies, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Emergency Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Emergency Dept, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Lehigh Valley Hosp & Hlth Network, Dept Emergency Med, Allentown, PA USA
[6] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Mental Hlth Serv, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Policy Program, Chicago, IL USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
triage; emergency severity index; emergency department;
D O I
10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.015
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Emergency Severity Index (EST) version 3 is a five-level triage acuity scale with demonstrated reliability and validity. Patients are rated from EST level I (highest acuity) to EST level 5 (lowest acuity). Clinical experience has demonstrated two levels of EST level 2 patients: those who require immediate intervention and those who are stable to wait for at least ten minutes. Studies have found that few patients are rated EST level 1, and it has been suggested that revisions to the EST might result in appropriate reclassification of some sickest level 2 patients as level 1. The purpose of this study was to identify level 2 patients who might be reclassified as level I patients. Methods: This was a multisite, prospective study. The authors identified EST level 2 patients who required immediate, lifesaving intervention and calculated chi-square statistics and odds ratios for variables that predicted which EST level 2 patients actually received immediate intervention. Results: Immediate lifesaving interventions were provided for 117 (20.20%) of the 589 patients included in the study. Seventeen predictors of the need for immediate intervention were identified. The strongest predictor was the triage nurse's judgment of the need for immediate intervention, especially airway and medications. Conclusions: Specific clinical findings at triage for a subset of EST level 2 patients were associated with immediate delivery of lifesaving interventions. Revisions to the EST level I criteria may be beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 501
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   The emergency severity index triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid [J].
Eitel, DR ;
Travers, DA ;
Rosenau, AM ;
Gilboy, N ;
Wuerz, RC .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (10) :1070-1080
[2]   How reliable is emergency department triage? [J].
Fernandes, CMB ;
Wuerz, R ;
Clark, S ;
Djurdjev, O .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 34 (02) :141-147
[3]  
Gilboy N, 2003, EMERGENCY SEVERITY I
[4]   Disagreement among health care professionals about the urgent care needs of emergency department patients [J].
Gill, JM ;
Reese, CL ;
Diamond, JJ .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 28 (05) :474-479
[5]   Reliability and validity of scores on the emergency severity index version 3 [J].
Tanabe, P ;
Gimbel, R ;
Yarnold, PR ;
Kyriacou, DN ;
Adams, JG .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (01) :59-65
[6]  
Tanabe Paula, 2004, J Emerg Nurs, V30, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jen.2003.11.004
[7]  
Travers Debbie A, 2002, J Emerg Nurs, V28, P395, DOI 10.1067/men.2002.127184
[8]   Inconsistency of emergency department triage [J].
Wuerz, R ;
Fernandes, CMB ;
Alarcon, J .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 32 (04) :431-435
[9]  
Wuerz R, 2001, ACAD EMERG MED, V8, P61
[10]   Implementation and refinement of the Emergency Severity Index [J].
Wuerz, RC ;
Travers, D ;
Gilboy, N ;
Eitel, DR ;
Rosenau, A ;
Yazhari, R .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (02) :170-176