Role of Prostate Specific Antigen and Immediate Confirmatory Biopsy in Predicting Progression During Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:155
作者
Adamy, Ari [1 ]
Yee, David S. [1 ]
Matsushita, Kazuhito [1 ]
Maschino, Alexandra [2 ]
Cronin, Angel [2 ]
Vickers, Andrew [2 ]
Guillonneau, Bertrand [1 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [1 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen; biopsy; disease progression; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; DOUBLING TIME; CURATIVE INTENT; FOLLOW-UP; MEN; INTERVENTION; VELOCITY; KINETICS; GRADE; PSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.095
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated predictors of progression after starting active surveillance, especially the role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: A total of 238 men with prostate cancer met active surveillance eligibility criteria and were analyzed for progression with time. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate predictors of progression. Progression was evaluated using 2 definitions, including no longer meeting 1) full and 2) modified criteria, excluding prostate specific antigen greater than 10 ng/ml as a criterion. Results: Using full criteria 61 patients progressed during followup. The 2 and 5-year progression-free probability was 80% and 60%, respectively. With prostate specific antigen included in progression criteria prostate specific antigen at confirmatory biopsy (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.46, p < 0.0005) and positive confirmatory biopsy (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.01-3.04, p = 0.047) were independent predictors of progression. Of the 61 cases 34 failed due to increased prostate specific antigen, including only 5 with subsequent progression by biopsy criteria. When prostate specific antigen was excluded from progression criteria, only 32 cases progressed, and 2 and 5-year progression-free probability was 91% and 76%, respectively. Using modified criteria as an end point positive confirmatory biopsy was the only independent predictor of progression (HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.41-7.09, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Active surveillance is feasible in patients with low risk prostate cancer and most patients show little evidence of progression within 5 years. There is no clear justification for treating patients in whom prostate specific antigen increases above 10 ng/ml in the absence of other indications of tumor progression. Patients considering active surveillance should undergo confirmatory biopsy to better assess the risk of progression.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 482
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Role of repeated biopsy of the prostate in predicting disease progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance [J].
Al Otaibi, Mohammed ;
Ross, Philip ;
Fahmy, Nader ;
Jeyaganth, Suganthiny ;
Trottier, Helen ;
Sircar, Kanishka ;
Begin, Louis R. ;
Souhami, Luis ;
Kassouf, Wassim ;
Aprikian, Armen ;
Tanguay, Simon .
CANCER, 2008, 113 (02) :286-292
[2]   PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer:: Results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section [J].
Ali, Khatami ;
Gunnar, Aus ;
Jan-Erik, Damber ;
Hans, Lija ;
Par, Lodding ;
Jonas, Hugosson .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 120 (01) :170-174
[3]   Insignificant Prostate Cancer and Active Surveillance: From Definition to Clinical Implications [J].
Bastian, Patrick J. ;
Carter, Ballentine H. ;
Bjartell, Anders ;
Seitz, Michael ;
Stanislaus, Peter ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Stief, Christian G. ;
Schroeder, Fritz .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (06) :1321-1332
[4]   Pathological Upgrading and Up Staging With Immediate Repeat Biopsy in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance [J].
Berglund, Ryan K. ;
Masterson, Timothy A. ;
Vora, Kinjal C. ;
Eggener, Scott E. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand D. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (05) :1964-1967
[5]   Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: An update of the Johns Hopkins experience [J].
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Kettermann, Anna ;
Warlick, Christopher ;
Metter, E. Jeffrey ;
Landis, Patricia ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (06) :2359-2364
[6]   Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: Preliminary results [J].
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC ;
Landis, P ;
Epstein, JI .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1231-1234
[7]   Feasibility study: Watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression [J].
Choo, R ;
Klotz, L ;
Danjoux, C ;
Morton, GC ;
DeBoer, G ;
Szumacher, E ;
Fleshner, N ;
Bunting, P ;
Hruby, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1664-1669
[8]   Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: Risk assessment and treatment [J].
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Broering, Jeannette M. ;
Kantoff, Philip W. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03) :S14-S19
[9]   Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort [J].
Dall'Era, Marc A. ;
Konety, Badrinath R. ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Stauf, Frank ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Meng, Maxwell V. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Perez, Nanette ;
Master, Viraj A. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
CANCER, 2008, 112 (12) :2664-2670
[10]   Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer - Review of the current literature [J].
Dall'Era, Marc A. ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Chan, June M. ;
Davies, Benjamin J. ;
Albertsen, Peter C. ;
Klotz, Laurence H. ;
Warlick, Christopher A. ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Bailey, Donald E., Jr. ;
Wallace, Meredith E. ;
Kantoff, Philip W. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
CANCER, 2008, 112 (08) :1650-1659